OK, we use group SMSC SMSC_ID=A only for receiving messages and the others
are used for sending ONLY, SMSC_ID = B is for MO messages and
SMSC_ID = C and SMSC_ID = D are for sending MT messages during the morning.
We have already asked for a separate connexion to send the MT but we need to
solve this issue meanwhile. When sending the MT’s in the morning I make some
tests sending SMS to our gateway and for my phone the delay is huge, also I
receive several times the answer of my request which I send only one time
(one sms = one answer) and there’s no queue in SMSC_ID=B. Errors found:
 
2008-11-12 14:30:49 [3918] [6] ERROR: SMPP[A]: SMSC returned error code
0x00000014 (Message Queue Full) in response to submit_sm.
2008-11-12 14:30:49 [3918] [6] WARNING: SMPP: PDU NULL terminated string
(message_id) has no NULL.
 
 
2008-11-12 14:32:05 [3918] [6] WARNING: DLR[mysql]: DLR from SMSC<A> for
DST<50240796989> not found.
2008-11-12 14:32:05 [3918] [6] ERROR: SMPP[A]: got DLR but could not find
message or was not interested in it id<3904438898> dst<50240796989>, type<1>
 
2008-11-12 12:45:44 [3918] [8] ERROR: SMPP[C]: SMSC returned error code
0x00000058 (Throttling error) in response to submit_sm.
 
Hope this might give you a better idea.
 
Thanks
 
Bernard
 
 
Kannel bearerbox version
Build `Nov 11 2008 07:54:56', compiler `4.1.2 20070925 (Red Hat 4.1.2-33)'.
System Linux, release 2.6.23.1-42.fc8, version #1 SMP Tue Oct 30 13:18:33
EDT 2007, machine x86_64.
Hostname kannelServer, IP 127.0.0.1.
Libxml version 2.6.30.
Using OpenSSL 0.9.8b 04 May 2006.
Compiled with MySQL 5.0.45, using MySQL 5.0.45.
Using native malloc.

 

group = core

admin-port = 13000

#wapbox-port = 13002

smsbox-port = 13001

admin-password = bar

wdp-interface-name = "*"

log-file = "/var/log/kannel/core.log"

log-level = 0

box-deny-ip = "*.*.*.*"

box-allow-ip = "127.0.0.1;10.27.1.*,130.7.*.*,10.10.10.*"

access-log = "/var/log/kannel/access.log"

unified-prefix = "+502,00502,0;+,00"

dlr-storage = mysql

include = "/etc/kannel/smsbox.conf"

 

group = smsc

smsc-id= A

smsc = smpp

host=130.1.1.50

port = 5016

smsc-username= "AGLOBAL1"

smsc-password= GLOBAL06

system-type= "SMSAGLOB"

source-addr-ton= 0

source-addr-npi= 0

dest-addr-ton= 0

dest-addr-npi= 0

source-addr-autodetect = true

transceiver-mode= true

msg-id-type = 0x00

allowed-smsc-id = "A"

denied-smsc-id = “B;C;D"

alt-charset = ISO-8859-1

 

group = smsc

smsc-id= B

smsc = smpp

host= ******

port = 5016

smsc-username= ******

smsc-password= ******

system-type= "SMSAGLOB"

source-addr-ton= 0

source-addr-npi= 0

dest-addr-ton= 0

dest-addr-npi= 0

transceiver-mode= false

source-addr-autodetect = true

receive-port = 0

msg-id-type = 0x00

allowed-smsc-id = "B"

denied-smsc-id = "A;C;D"

alt-charset = ISO-8859-1

 

group = smsc

smsc-id= comcel3

smsc = smpp

host= ******

port = 5016

smsc-username= ******

smsc-password= ******

system-type= "SMSAGLOB"

source-addr-ton= 0

source-addr-npi= 0

dest-addr-ton= 0

dest-addr-npi= 0

source-addr-autodetect = true

transceiver-mode= false

receive-port = 0

msg-id-type = 0x00

allowed-smsc-id = "C"

denied-smsc-id = "A;B;D"

alt-charset = ISO-8859-1

 

group = smsc

smsc-id= comcel4

smsc = smpp

host= ******

port = 5016

smsc-username= ******

smsc-password= ******

system-type= "SMSAGLOB"

source-addr-ton= 0

source-addr-npi= 0

dest-addr-ton= 0

dest-addr-npi= 0

transceiver-mode= false

source-addr-autodetect = true

receive-port = 0

msg-id-type = 0x00

allowed-smsc-id = "D"

denied-smsc-id = "A;B;C"

alt-charset = ISO-8859-1

 

group = mysql-connection

id = mydlr

host = localhost

username = kannel

password = kannel321

database = sms

max-connections = 1

 

group = dlr-db

id = mydlr

table = dlr

field-smsc = smsc

field-timestamp = ts

field-destination = destination

field-source = source

field-service = service

field-url = url

field-mask = mask

field-status = status

field-boxc-id = boxc

 

 

-----Original Message-----
From: Stipe Tolj [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: miércoles, 12 de noviembre de 2008 11:06
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Received SMS Delay

 

Bernard Cotton schrieb:

> Dear users:

> 

> It’s been a while since we have been experience a kind of delay when

> receiving a SMS during a big load of MT messages sent from our Kannel to

> the SMPP. The delay can be from 5 minutes to an hour and during this

> time the message is received more then one time, I guess it’s trying

> several times to access our gateway but our applications respond every

> time. I checked the logs and there’s no error, this delay is during the

> morning when we send aprox. 15 000 MT SMS in 4 hours. After the load is

> sent, the delay is still present but after a few hours the response

> returns to normal. We have 1 SMMP connexion spitted in 4, the first one

> is used to receive SMS only, and the second one is used to send MO

> messages and the third and fourth is used to send MT messages during the

> day. Is there anyway to control this delay? Or prevent receiving the

> same message?

 

which of the smsc groups is used for the MO part?

 

What can be seen on various SMSCs is that concurrency between MT and MO on

transceiver session is a problem. I.e. when bearerbox gets a huge MO load in
the

transceiver session, the concurrent MT stream towards the SMSC is
decreasing.

 

We surely need some more informations on the specific scenario you have here
to

have a better overall picture of what is happening.

 

Can you describe the whole scenario a bit more in details and also describe
on

how you detect the delay and what log entries are suspicious to you?

 

Stipe

 

-- 

-------------------------------------------------------------------

Kölner Landstrasse 419

40589 Düsseldorf, NRW, Germany

 

tolj.org system architecture      Kannel Software Foundation (KSF)

http://www.tolj.org/              http://www.kannel.org/

 

mailto:st_{at}_tolj.org           mailto:stolj_{at}_kannel.org

-------------------------------------------------------------------

 

 

-- 

This message has been scanned for viruses and

dangerous content by MailScanner, and is

believed to be clean.

 


-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.

Reply via email to