Excellent ! works like a charm again.

Thanks a lot for this quick fix
Stephane


--
Stephane Rosa
IT Security & Network Specialist, EMEA
Tel:  +41 21 966-1238
Cell: +41 79 616-0828

Stryker EMEA
Grand Rue 92
CH-1820 Montreux
http://www.europe.stryker.com



Alexander Malysh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

28-05-05 14:57

To
[email protected]
cc
Subject
Re: cpu load 99% by bearerbox





Hi,

please retest with latest CVS HEAD. Bug should fixed now.

Thanks,
Alex

Stephane Rosa schrieb:
>
> Opened bug 0000230 about "bearerbox causes 99% cpu load"
>
> (for the records in this users mailing list)
>
> Stephane
>
> --
> Stephane Rosa
> IT Security & Network Specialist, EMEA
> Tel:  +41 21 966-1238
> Cell: +41 79 616-0828
>
> Stryker EMEA
> Grand Rue 92
> CH-1820 Montreux
> http://www.europe.stryker.com
>
>
> *Stephane Rosa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>*
> Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> 25-05-05 12:39
>
>                  
> To
>                  Julien Buratto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> cc
>                  [email protected]
> Subject
>                  Re: cpu load 99% by bearerbox
>
>
>                  
>
>
>
>
>
>
> I just compiled the same sources on a dual-cpu Sun server and
> the behavior is exactly the same as on RedHat 9 (SE).
>
> How come is this happening ? Are we the only one experiencing
> this ??
>
> Stephane
>
> --
> Stephane Rosa
> IT Security & Network Specialist, EMEA
> Tel:  +41 21 966-1238
> Cell: +41 79 616-0828
>
> Stryker EMEA
> Grand Rue 92
> CH-1820 Montreux
> http://www.europe.stryker.com
>
> *Stephane Rosa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>*
> Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> 25-05-05 11:34
>
>                  
> To
>                  Julien Buratto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> cc
>                  [email protected]
> Subject
>                  Re: cpu load 99% by bearerbox
>
>
>
>                  
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Fiddling with gdb, I found out that the high cpu load
> is caused by the call to gwthread_sleep(10.0); at line
> 605 of bearerbox.c.
>
> Tracing further, gwthread_sleep calls poll(), with a
> timeout of 10 seconds. When I step that line, gdb
> hangs for the entire 10 seconds and the cpu raises
> straight to 99%.
>
> poll() is supposed to sleep until something happend
> on an fd, I have no idea why this happens.
>
> Those two pieces of code seem not to have
> changed since 2003, so I'm surprised we are
> not all of us seeing the same issue.
>
> I will compile and run it on Solaris to see if it
> makes any difference. Maybe poll() behaves
> differently on RedHat SE.
>
> Cheers
> Stephane
>
>
> --
> Stephane Rosa
> IT Security & Network Specialist, EMEA
> Tel:  +41 21 966-1238
> Cell: +41 79 616-0828
>
> Stryker EMEA
> Grand Rue 92
> CH-1820 Montreux
> http://www.europe.stryker.com
> *Julien Buratto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>*
> Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> 24-05-05 17:49
>
>                  
> To
>                  Stephane Rosa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> cc
>                  [email protected]
> Subject
>                  Re: cpu load 99% by bearerbox
>
>
>
>
>                  
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Stephane Rosa wrote:
>  >
>  > Thanks Julien, I did that already and the gdb thing
>  > reveals a backtrace on gwthread_sleep like you were
>  > experiencing I guess.
>  >
>  > May I ask how you solved your problem ?
>  >
>  > Thanks
>  >
>
> Make this laught: I havent' :)
> I'm still using 1.4.0 because CVS goes into cpu overload so I've decided
> to manually patch the 1.4.0 and apply there my own code.
>
> J
>



Reply via email to