I agree that it's a dirty hack, but it's been working
in a production environment for several months now
without any problems.
I think the most elegant solution would be to add an
option to the .conf file to indicate that Kannel
should in fact NOT delete the DLRs from its DLR table
when the messages have been delivered (or not
delivered).
Something like:
group = dlr-db
id = ...
table = ...
delete-dlrs = false
What is the procedure to bring this request to the
developers' attention ? I haven't posted to the
developers list before.
Let's help to make Kannel even better.
Lourens...
--- fred <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Lourens and group,
>
> Please see "In Support of Billing MT sms" in the
> devel list for our
> solution to add a transaction id to the sendsms, I
> added a %z feature.
> The so and sos of this list dismissed this idea. We
> did this on the 1.3.1
> kannel code, could supply a patch if interested.
> May i comment that your solution has a lot of if(s)
> this then if ...not sure
> how reliable that can be, the transaction No. idea
> is a more elegant.
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
SBC Yahoo! - Internet access at a great low price.
http://promo.yahoo.com/sbc/
