Hi, Partition may be reassigned if the consumer is not reachable. Will partition reassignment cause same message being processed in parallel? Suppose if Kafka found consumer A is not reachable (maybe because of network problem), it assigns the partition to consumer B. But actually consumer A is still running, this may cause the situation that a same message is processed in parallel by consumer A and consumer B. If the logic in processing the message includes updating some database tables, we have to lock some rows first. If such parallel processing the same message can not happen, we needn't use lock. Appreciate if you can provide some information on this.
Best regards, Yun
