It's okay. You could probably take the screenshot and share it. On Tue, 3 Mar 2020, 20:13 sunil chaudhari, <sunilmchaudhar...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Himanshu, > Sorry but I pasted from excel. Dont know how it got messed up? > > Will resend it. > > On Tue, 3 Mar 2020 at 6:48 PM, Himanshu Shukla < > himanshushukla...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > could you please share the result in some proper way? Each field is line > by > > line. > > > > On Tue, Mar 3, 2020 at 2:43 PM Sunil CHAUDHARI > > <sunilchaudh...@dbs.com.invalid> wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > > I have done performance testing of Kafka cluster using > > > kafka-producer-perf-test.sh > > > I created diff type of topics and did perf testing. Example: MB1P1R= MB > > is > > > my topic name with 1 Partition and 1 replica. > > > I have 3 nodes cluster. > > > > > > My Observations: > > > > > > * When I increased partitions, and keep replica same, then > Throughput > > > increases. Compare Row 1 and 2 > > > * Increase number of replica and partitions same: Throughput > > > decreased than before. Row 2 and 3 > > > * Increase number of partitions and keep replica same as before: TP > > > increased. Row 3 and 4 > > > * Increase number of Replica and keep partitions same: TP > decreased. > > > Row 4 and 5. > > > > > > Question: Does it make any impact on throughput when number of > partitions > > > and replicas are equal? > > > > > > Sr NO > > > > > > Topic > > > > > > Partitions > > > > > > Replicas > > > > > > Network.threads > > > > > > IO-Threads > > > > > > Records Sent > > > > > > Batch-size-avg > > > > > > Throughput > > > > > > Latency (ms) > > > > > > Records/sec > > > > > > Size/sec > > > > > > Avg > > > > > > Max > > > > > > 1 > > > > > > MB1P1R > > > > > > 1 > > > > > > 1 > > > > > > 3 > > > > > > 8 > > > > > > 65495 > > > > > > 16220 > > > > > > 68653.03983 > > > > > > 13.78 MB/sec > > > > > > 163.67 > > > > > > 245 > > > > > > 2 > > > > > > MB2P1R > > > > > > 2 > > > > > > 1 > > > > > > 3 > > > > > > 8 > > > > > > 65495 > > > > > > 15865.719 > > > > > > 58269.57295 > > > > > > 11.70 MB/sec > > > > > > 173.81 > > > > > > 470 > > > > > > 3 > > > > > > MB2P2R > > > > > > 2 > > > > > > 2 > > > > > > 3 > > > > > > 8 > > > > > > 65495 > > > > > > 16202.813 > > > > > > 46286.21908 > > > > > > 9.29 MB/sec > > > > > > 417.33 > > > > > > 704 > > > > > > 4 > > > > > > MB3P2R > > > > > > 3 > > > > > > 2 > > > > > > 3 > > > > > > 8 > > > > > > 65495 > > > > > > 16184 > > > > > > 56412.57537 > > > > > > 11.32 MB/sec > > > > > > 229.82 > > > > > > 550 > > > > > > 5 > > > > > > MB3P3R > > > > > > 3 > > > > > > 3 > > > > > > 3 > > > > > > 8 > > > > > > 65495 > > > > > > > > > > > > 46417.43444 > > > > > > 9.32 MB/sec > > > > > > 411.44 > > > > > > 705 > > > > > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > Sunil. > > > CONFIDENTIAL NOTE: > > > The information contained in this email is intended only for the use of > > > the individual or entity named above and may contain information that > is > > > privileged, confidential and exempt from disclosure under applicable > law. > > > If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are > > hereby > > > notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this > > > communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message > > in > > > error, please immediately notify the sender and delete the mail. Thank > > you. > > > > > > > > > -- > > Regards, > > Himanshu Shukla > > >
