Hey Ryanne, Amazing! Thanks for pointing this out. I’ll take a look soon.
Regards, On Tue, 7 Jan 2020 at 17:15, Ryanne Dolan <ryannedo...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hello. The dev list might be a better place to ask this question. FWIW I > believe your interpretation is correct -- the proposal essentially uses two > separate clusters, comprising "controllers" and "brokers". N.B. that the > brokers cannot become controllers or vice versa. > > You can find the discussion thread here: > > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/cce5313ebe72bde34bf0da3af5a1723db3ee871667b1fd8edf2ee7ab@%3Cdev.kafka.apache.org%3E > > You will see I expressed concerns early on that "the proposal still > requires separate processes with separate configuration". > > Ryanne > > On Thu, Jan 2, 2020 at 9:45 AM M. Manna <manme...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > Greetings of the New Year to everybody. Sorry for reviving this randomly, > > as I didn't have the original thread anymore. > > > > I was reading through this KIP and trying to following the current vs > > proposed diagrams. Once again, apologies for making mistakes in > > understanding this. > > > > Are we replacing the ZK cluster with another kafka cluster which will > > simply do what ZK is doing? Or, are we simply distributing the metadata > > management job to the existing kafka cluster? I believe it's the former > as > > I read on the KIP that the metadata manager (in post-ZK world) would be > > separate from Kafka brokers But it would be good if someone can correct > me. > > > > Thanks and Best Regards, > > >
