Thanks Jonathan. On Sun 27 Oct, 2019, 12:13 AM Jonathan Santilli, <jonathansanti...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello, > > I can confirm that the version 2.2.0 supports OpenJDK 8 in the broker side, > we are using it on production. > > > Cheers! > -- > Jonathan > > On Sat, Oct 26, 2019, 4:47 PM Debraj Manna <subharaj.ma...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > Kafka latest doc mention about JDK 8. But make no mention of openjdk or > > Oracle JDK. Can someone confirm if JDK 8 means openjdk 8 is also > supported? > > > > https://kafka.apache.org/documentation/#java > > > > On Fri 25 Oct, 2019, 9:17 PM Debraj Manna, <subharaj.ma...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > > > Thanks for the pointers. > > > > > > Does kafka 2.2.1 support openjdk 8? > > > > > > On Fri 25 Oct, 2019, 3:51 PM M. Manna, <manme...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > >> It’s in Github. Look for release tab it’s rx-2 for 2.3.1. You can > > download > > >> and run it using Openjdk11 and see how it goes. > > >> > > >> I don’t see any Jenkins build for 2.3.1 with jdk11, but there’s > > definitely > > >> a trunk build passing for jdl11 yesterday morning. > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> On Fri, 25 Oct 2019 at 04:16, Debraj Manna <subharaj.ma...@gmail.com> > > >> wrote: > > >> > > >> > Can you point me to the link where I have to check? > > >> > > > >> > On Thu 24 Oct, 2019, 7:54 PM M. Manna, <manme...@gmail.com> wrote: > > >> > > > >> > > Have you checked the Kafka build 2.3.1 RC2 which everyone is > > currently > > >> > > voting for ? It’s worth checking for your question... > > >> > > > > >> > > Regards. > > >> > > On Thu, 24 Oct 2019 at 13:31, Debraj Manna < > > subharaj.ma...@gmail.com> > > >> > > wrote: > > >> > > > > >> > > > Hi > > >> > > > > > >> > > > Does Kafka work with OpenJDK 11? I have seen the below issue > which > > >> is > > >> > > > resolved in 2.1. > > >> > > > > > >> > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-7264 > > >> > > > > > >> > > > But it does not mention about OpenJDK. Can someone confirm if > > Kafka > > >> > 2.2.1 > > >> > > > is supported with OpenJDK 11 also? > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > > > > >
