Hi,
  i agree with Liam, the OOM look to happen during produce time. I would
look into that.

But with your message size, i would recommend investigating to implement
ClaimChecks. It will be much easier and reduce the avg message size.

-- Pere

On Thu, 22 Aug 2019, 01:12 Liam Clarke <liam.cla...@adscale.co.nz> wrote:

> Hi I Vic,
>
> Your OOM is happening before any compression is applied. It's occurring
> when the StringSerializer is converting the string to bytes. Looking deeper
> into StringCoding.encode, it's first allocating a byte array to fit your
> string, and this is where your OOM is occurring, line 300 of
> StringCoding.java is  byte[] ba = new byte[en];
>
> Compression is applied after the string is serialized to bytes. So you'll
> need to increase your heap size to support this.
>
> Hope that helps :)
>
> Liam Clarke
>
> On Thu, Aug 22, 2019 at 1:52 AM l vic <lvic4...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > I have to deal with large ( 16M) text messages in my Kafka system, so i
> > increased several message limit settings on broker/producer/consumer site
> > and now the system is able to get them through....I also tried to enable
> > compression in producer:
> > "compression.type"= "gzip"
> > but to my surprise ended up with OOM exceptions on producer side:
> > Exception in thread "main" java.lang.OutOfMemoryError: Java heap space at
> > java.lang.StringCoding$StringEncoder.encode(StringCoding.java:300) at
> > java.lang.StringCoding.encode(StringCoding.java:344) at
> > java.lang.String.getBytes(String.java:918) at
> >
> >
> org.apache.kafka.common.serialization.StringSerializer.serialize(StringSerializer.java:43)
> > at
> >
> >
> org.apache.kafka.common.serialization.StringSerializer.serialize(StringSerializer.java:24)
> > at
> >
> >
> org.apache.kafka.clients.producer.KafkaProducer.send(KafkaProducer.java:326)
> > at
> >
> >
> org.apache.kafka.clients.producer.KafkaProducer.send(KafkaProducer.java:248)
> > Shouldn't I be able to save memory with compression? Why does the
> > compression have the opposite effect?
> >
>

Reply via email to