Hi Michael Eugene,

You're correct - you only need to upgrade your Kafka Streams dependencies
in your build file. Looking at MVN Repository, the streams lib will
implicitly bring in its dependency on kafka-clients, but you can always
include your own explicit dependency on it.
https://mvnrepository.com/artifact/org.apache.kafka/kafka-streams/2.0.0

Kind regards,

Liam Clarke

On Tue, Sep 11, 2018 at 1:43 PM, Michael Eugene <far...@hotmail.com> wrote:

> Well to bring up that kafka to 2.0, do I just need for sbt kafka clients
> and kafka streams 2.0 for sbt?  And it doesn't matter if the system is not
> Kafka 2.0? Upgrading Kafka itself is probably not an option or me right now.
>
>
>
>
>
> ________________________________
> From: John Roesler <j...@confluent.io>
> Sent: Monday, September 10, 2018 4:18:24 PM
> To: users@kafka.apache.org
> Subject: Re: SAM Scala aggregate
>
> In addition to the other suggestions, if you're having too much trouble
> with the interface, you can always fall back to creating anonymous
> Initializer/Aggregator instances the way you would if programming in Java.
> This way, you wouldn't need SAM conversion at all (all it's doing is
> turning your functions into an Initializer and Aggregator).
>
> On Mon, Sep 10, 2018 at 8:32 AM Sean Glover <sean.glo...@lightbend.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > SAM conversions can be enabled in 2.11 with the -Xexperimental to scalac.
> > However, this version of SAM conversions isn't recommended for production
> > and was significantly refactored for 2.12.  When we contributed this API
> to
> > Kafka we explicitly removed the SAM conversions because we didn't want to
> > require the Kafka build (or end user builds) to enable this experimental
> > feature.
> >
> > Echoing what Debasish has already said, the lightbend/kafka-streams-scala
> > project is deprecated.  If the app your building is destined for
> production
> > you should use the Kafka 2.0+ client libraries which are backwards
> > compatible with older versions of the brokers; you don't need to get
> > everyone else to upgrade their clients or your cluster.
> >
> > Regards
> > Sean
> >
> > On Sun, Sep 9, 2018 at 3:59 PM Michael Eugene <far...@hotmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > > I’m integrating with lot of other applications and it would be a little
> > > cowboy to chose my own version.  I can commend that we all went to 2.0
> > but
> > > there are already working application me so it won’t be possible to
> > upgrade
> > > everything that everyone else is doing.  That will have to happen
> > sometime
> > > though. It’s just not gonna happen this week and my goal is to get
> > > something working by tomorrow and I’ll stay up all night if I have to.
> > >
> > > Sent from my iPhone
> > >
> > > > On Sep 9, 2018, at 2:11 PM, Matthias J. Sax <matth...@confluent.io>
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Why can't you use Kafka Streams 2.0?
> > > >
> > > > Note: Kafka Streams is backward compatible and it can connect to
> older
> > > > brokers -- it's not required to upgrade your cluster to use Kafka
> > > > Streams 2.0 -- updating you maven/gradle dependency is sufficient.
> > > >
> > > > Also, AFAIK SAM conversions are only available in Scala 2.12.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > -Matthias
> > > >
> > > >> On 9/9/18 11:37 AM, Michael Eugene wrote:
> > > >> I can’t do Kafka 2.0. I am limited to this version right now.  If I
> > > continue to struggle with it this much, I can eventually do that.
> > However,
> > > I know other people in the organization have things kafka working with
> > > Scala. Probably not a good idea to say it’s a necessity when it’s not
> > > completely necessary. Your point is well taken though, I am considering
> > it.
> > > >>
> > > >> Sent from my iPhone
> > > >>
> > > >>> On Sep 9, 2018, at 1:10 PM, Debasish Ghosh <
> ghosh.debas...@gmail.com
> > >
> > > wrote:
> > > >>>
> > > >>> I don't have the environment to run the Scala code right now. Will
> be
> > > >>> tomorrow until I have one ..
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Now that Scala API is part of the official Kafka distribution. Can
> u
> > > please
> > > >>> try that out instead of kafka-streams-scala ? The library is now
> > > deprecated
> > > >>> and I remember we ran into some SAM related issues with Scala 2.11
> > > (which
> > > >>> worked fine with 2.12). They were finally fixed in the Kafka
> > > distribution -
> > > >>> there are some differences in the APIs as well ..
> > > >>>
> > > >>> regards.
> > > >>>
> > > >>>> On Sun, Sep 9, 2018 at 11:32 PM Michael Eugene <
> far...@hotmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> I’m using 2.11.11
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> Sent from my iPhone
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>> On Sep 9, 2018, at 12:13 PM, Debasish Ghosh <
> > > ghosh.debas...@gmail.com>
> > > >>>> wrote:
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>> Which version of Scala are u using ?
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>>> On Sun, 9 Sep 2018 at 10:44 AM, Michael Eugene <
> > far...@hotmail.com>
> > > >>>> wrote:
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>> Hi,
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>> I am using kafak-sreams-scala
> > > >>>>>> https://github.com/lightbend/kafka-streams-scala, and I am
> trying
> > > to
> > > >>>>>> implement something very simple and I am getting a compilation
> > > error by
> > > >>>> the
> > > >>>>>> "aggregate" method. The error is "Cannot resolve overload method
> > > >>>>>> 'aggregate'" and "Unspecified value parameters: materialized:
> > > >>>>>> Materialized[String, NotInferedVR, KeyValueStore[Bytes,
> > > Array[Byte]]]"
> > > >>>>>> [https://avatars0.githubusercontent.com/u/16247783?s=400&v=4]<
> > > >>>>>> https://github.com/lightbend/kafka-streams-scala>
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>> GitHub
> > > >>>>>> - lightbend/kafka-streams-scala: Thin Scala wrapper ...<
> > > >>>>>> https://github.com/lightbend/kafka-streams-scala>
> > > >>>>>> github.com
> > > >>>>>> Note:
> > > >>>>>> Scala API for Kafka Streams have been accepted for inclusion in
> > > Apache
> > > >>>>>> Kafka. We have been working with the Kafka team since the last
> > > couple of
> > > >>>>>> months working towards meeting the standards and guidelines for
> > this
> > > >>>>>> activity. Lightbend and Alexis Seigneurin have
> > > >>>>>> contributed this library (with ...
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>> However when I add a third argument for a Materialized, I get
> the
> > > >>>>>> compilation error "Too may arguments for method aggregate(()
> =>VR,
> > > >>>> (K,V,VR)
> > > >>>>>> => VR)"
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>> It doesn't make sense anymore what could be breaking this.
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>> val myStream = builder
> > > >>>>>> .stream(inputTopic)
> > > >>>>>> .map{ (key: String, value: Array[Byte]) =>
> > > >>>>>>  println(s"key = ${key}")
> > > >>>>>>  val newKey = GroupByAction.getGroupByKeyFromByteAray(value)
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>  val newValue = GroupByAction.getGroupByValueFromByteAray(
> value)
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>  println(s"newKey = ${newKey}")
> > > >>>>>>  (newKey, serialise(newValue))}
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>> .groupByKey
> > > >>>>>> .aggregate(()=> 0L, (k,v,vr) => vr + 1)
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>> --
> > > >>>>> Sent from my iPhone
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>> --
> > > >>> Debasish Ghosh
> > > >>> http://manning.com/ghosh2
> > > >>> http://manning.com/ghosh
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Twttr: @debasishg
> > > >>> Blog: http://debasishg.blogspot.com
> > > >>> Code: http://github.com/debasishg
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Senior Software Engineer, Lightbend, Inc.
> >
> > <http://lightbend.com>
> >
> > @seg1o <https://twitter.com/seg1o>, in/seanaglover
> > <https://www.linkedin.com/in/seanaglover/>
> >
>

Reply via email to