It is a deliberate change in JDK code

Just for reference see this discussion  on nio-dev list on OpenJDK
http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/nio-dev/2018-April/005008.html


see
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8168628

Cheers
Enrico



2018-03-05 14:29 GMT+01:00 Enrico Olivelli <eolive...@gmail.com>:

> Workaround:
> as these brokers are only for test environments I have set very small
> values for index file size, which affects pre-allocation
> segment.index.bytes=65536
> log.index.size.max.bytes=65536
>
> If anyone has some thought it will be very appreciated
> Cheers
>
> Enrico
>
>
> 2018-03-05 13:21 GMT+01:00 Enrico Olivelli <eolive...@gmail.com>:
>
>> The only fact I have found is that with Java8 Kafka is creating "SPARSE"
>> files and with Java9 this is not true anymore
>>
>> Enrico
>>
>> 2018-03-05 12:44 GMT+01:00 Enrico Olivelli <eolive...@gmail.com>:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>> This is a very strage case. I have a Kafka broker (part of a cluster of
>>> 3 brokers) which cannot start upgrading Java from Oracle JDK8 to Oracle JDK
>>> 9.0.4.
>>>
>>> There are a lot of .index and .timeindex files taking 10MB, they are for
>>> empty partiions.
>>>
>>> Running with Java 9 the server seems to rebuild these files and each
>>> file takes "really" 10MB.
>>> The sum of all the files (calculated using du -sh) is 22GB and the
>>> broker crashes during startup, disk becomes full and no log more is
>>> written. (I can send an extraction of the logs, but the tell only  about
>>> 'rebuilding index', the same as on Java 8)
>>>
>>> Reverting the same broker to Java 8 and removing the index files, the
>>> broker rebuilds such files, each files take 10MB, but the full sum of sizes
>>> (calculated using du -sh) is 38 MB !
>>>
>>> I am running this broker on CentosOS 7 on EXT4 FS.
>>>
>>> I have upgraded the broker to latest and greatest Kafka 1.0.0 (from
>>> 0.10.2) without any success.
>>>
>>> All of the other testing clusters on CentOS7 (same SO settings) did not
>>> have any problem.
>>>
>>> The broker is given 4GB or RAM and 4G of Max Direct Memory Size (on
>>> Java8 it works fine with 1GB and default max direct memory size)
>>>
>>> Which are the relevant configuration options ?
>>>
>>> Thoughts ?
>>>
>>> Thank you
>>>
>>> Enrico
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>

Reply via email to