Oops, I was mistaken. I meant serialization of an object as a byte array from the first place!
On Wed, Jan 10, 2018 at 3:20 PM, Thunder Stumpges < thunder.stump...@gmail.com> wrote: > Byte Array is essentially "serialized" already isn't it? I mean the message > itself is sent as a byte array, so the default byte array serializer is as > "efficient" as it gets, as it's just sending your byte array through as the > message... there's no serialization happening. > -Thunder > > On Tue, Jan 9, 2018 at 8:17 PM Ali Nazemian <alinazem...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Thanks, Matt. Have you done any benchmarking to see how using different > > Serializers may impact throughput/latency? > > > > Regards, > > Ali > > > > On Wed, Jan 10, 2018 at 7:55 AM, Matt Farmer <m...@frmr.me> wrote: > > > > > We use the default byte array serializer provided with Kafka and it > works > > > great for us. > > > > > > > On Jan 9, 2018, at 8:12 AM, Ali Nazemian <alinazem...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > > > > > > Hi All, > > > > > > > > I was wondering whether there is any best practice/recommendation for > > > > publishing byte messages to Kafka. Is there any specific Serializer > > that > > > is > > > > recommended for this matter? > > > > > > > > Cheers, > > > > Ali > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > A.Nazemian > > > -- A.Nazemian