Hi Yifan,

Just to make sure I understand, the comparison is between 0.8.2.1 and
0.10.0.0 clients (both) connecting to a 0.10.0.0 cluster? We haven't
received reports of increased average producer latency and I'm not aware of
a change that could cause such a dramatic difference. Is compression being
used and did you paste the full producer config?

Ismael

On Fri, Sep 2, 2016 at 6:31 PM, Yifan Ying <nafan...@gmail.com> wrote:

> The load before and after the upgrade are pretty similar. And all these
> configs stayed same too.
>
> Also please correct me if I am wrong. I think the request latency =
> response received time - request created time. And request created time is
> created when the records are ready to be sent after 'lingering'.
>
> Yifan
>
> On Thu, Sep 1, 2016 at 11:01 PM, Gerard Klijs <gerard.kl...@dizzit.com>
> wrote:
>
> > With a linger of 5 seconds, 2-3 seconds would make sense when the load is
> > smaller, are are sure the measurements with 0.8.2.1 where with the same
> > load and/or linger worked correctly there?
> >
> > On Fri, Sep 2, 2016 at 1:12 AM Yifan Ying <nafan...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > We tried to upgrade the Kafka clients dependency from 0.8.2.1 to
> > 0.10.0.0.
> > > As I understand, the producer client doesn't have major changes in
> 0.10,
> > so
> > > we kept the same producer config in the upgrade:
> > >
> > > retries 3
> > > retry.backoff.ms 5000
> > > timeout.ms 10000
> > > block.on.buffer.full false
> > > linger.ms 5000
> > > metadata.fetch.timeout.ms 30000
> > >
> > > However, after the upgrade, the avg producer request latency increased
> by
> > > 5×, from a few hundreds milliseconds to 2-3 seconds. Anyone has seen
> this
> > > issue? Is there any change in 0.9/0.10 that would cause this?
> > >
> > > Thanks!
> > >
> > > --
> > > Yifan
> > >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Yifan
>

Reply via email to