Hi,

I think the recommended approach to this would be to have a single topic and 
partition it by userId. This will give you locality and order by user. If you 
think about it this would give you a better ordering guarantee than if you had 
one topic per users. It's also a lot more efficient. If you are using Kafka as 
a log or messaging system you really should not need millions of topics or 
partitions. If I'm miss understanding the use case please let me know. 

Cheers, 

David Newberger

-----Original Message-----
From: Hyounmin Wang [mailto:hyunmi...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, July 5, 2016 1:50 AM
To: users@kafka.apache.org
Subject: Kafka Beginners planning problem.

Hi there!

I'm new grad engineer and is pretty new to kafka world.

I'm trying to replace rabbit mq with apache-kafka and while planning, I bumped 
in to several conceptual planning problem.

First we are using rabbit mq for per user queue policy meaning each user uses 
one queue. This suits our need because each user represent some job to be done 
with that particular user, and if that user causes a problem, the queue will 
never have a problem with other users because queues are seperated ( Problem 
meaning messages in the queue will be dispatch to the users using http request. 
If user refuses to receive a message (server down
perhaps?) it will go back in retry queue, which will result in no loses of 
message (Unless queue goes down))

Now kafka is fault tolerant and failure safe because it write to a disk.
And its exactly why I am trying to implement kafka to our structure.

but there are problem to my plannings.

First, I was thinking to create as many topic as per user meaning each user 
would have each topic (What problem will this cause? My max estimate is that I 
will have around 1~5 million topics)

Second, If I decide to go for topics based on operation and partition by random 
hash of users id, if there was a problem with one user not consuming message 
currently, will the all user in the partition have to wait ? What would be the 
best way to structure this situation?

So as conclusion, 1~5 millions users. We do not want to have one user blocking 
large number of other users being processed. Having topic per user will solve 
this issue, it seems like there might be an issue with zookeeper if such large 
number gets in (Is this true? )

what would be the best solution for structuring? Considering scalability?

Reply via email to