Assigned to you :) On Mon, Feb 1, 2016 at 10:46 PM, Adam Kunicki <a...@streamsets.com> wrote:
> Done: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-3191 > < > https://mailtrack.io/trace/link/3bdac0fc9ba873124166ced41257394c37af6bdd?url=https%3A%2F%2Fissues.apache.org%2Fjira%2Fbrowse%2FKAFKA-3191&signature=7188d1843f83499b > > > Feel free to assign it to me (wasn't able to do that myself) > > On Mon, Feb 1, 2016 at 9:55 PM, Gwen Shapira <g...@confluent.io> wrote: > > > This is the second time I see this complaint, so we could probably make > the > > API docs clearer. > > > > Adam, feel like submitting a JIRA? > > > > On Mon, Feb 1, 2016 at 3:34 PM, Adam Kunicki <a...@streamsets.com> > wrote: > > > > > Thanks, actually found this out per: > > > > > > > > > http://www.confluent.io/blog/tutorial-getting-started-with-the-new-apache-kafka-0.9-consumer-client > > > < > > > > > > https://mailtrack.io/trace/link/f2e80a9ef7bfbabfc3e6f8951266d07b52051751?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.confluent.io%2Fblog%2Ftutorial-getting-started-with-the-new-apache-kafka-0.9-consumer-client&signature=44a0b68933da863e > > > > > > > > > > from TFA: > > > > > > consumer.commitSync(Collections.singletonMap(record.partition(), new > > > OffsetAndMetadata(record.offset() + 1))); > > > > > > The committed offset should always be the offset of the next message > that > > > your application will read. > > > > > > Wish this was a bit clearer in the API docs :) > > > > > > On Mon, Feb 1, 2016 at 1:52 PM, Dana Powers <dana.pow...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > > > > > The committed offset is actually the next message to consume, not the > > > last > > > > message consumed. So that sounds like expected behavior to me. The > > > consumer > > > > code handles this internally, but if you write code to commit offsets > > > > manually, it can be a gotcha. > > > > > > > > -Dana > > > > > > > > On Mon, Feb 1, 2016 at 1:35 PM, Adam Kunicki <a...@streamsets.com> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > > > I've been noticing that a restarted consumer in 0.9 will start > > > consuming > > > > > from the last committed offset (inclusive). This means that any > > > restarted > > > > > consumer will get the last read (and committed) message causing a > > > > duplicate > > > > > each time the consumer is restarted from the same position if there > > > have > > > > > been no new messages. > > > > > > > > > > Per: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.confluent.io/blog/tutorial-getting-started-with-the-new-apache-kafka-0.9-consumer-client > > > > < > > > > > > https://mailtrack.io/trace/link/f2e80a9ef7bfbabfc3e6f8951266d07b52051751?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.confluent.io%2Fblog%2Ftutorial-getting-started-with-the-new-apache-kafka-0.9-consumer-client&signature=44a0b68933da863e > > > > > > > > > < > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://mailtrack.io/trace/link/9853c5856f2b5862212148c1a969575c970a3dcc?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.confluent.io%2Fblog%2Ftutorial-getting-started-with-the-new-apache-kafka-0.9-consumer-client&signature=63a1a40b88347844 > > > > > > > > > > > this seems like that is the intended behavior. > > > > > > > > > > Can anyone confirm this? If this is the case how are we expected to > > > > handle > > > > > these duplicated messages? > > > > > > > > > > -Adam > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > Adam Kunicki > > > StreamSets | Field Engineer > > > mobile: 415.890.DATA (3282) | linkedin > > > < > > > > > > https://mailtrack.io/trace/link/50832933390e909694a7f2157c5d640476609cd1?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.adamkunicki.com&signature=c5598df83da6c7fa > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > Adam Kunicki > StreamSets | Field Engineer > mobile: 415.890.DATA (3282) | linkedin > < > https://mailtrack.io/trace/link/a7f1302905f447f07ec44b6eaaaf95463a26b7ea?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.adamkunicki.com&signature=c3965698083a715b > > >
