+1, facing same issue.
> 在 2016年1月22日，下午11:13，Han JU <ju.han.fe...@gmail.com> 写道：
>
> Hi,
>
> I'm prototyping with the new consumer API of kafka 0.9 and I'm particularly
> interested in the `ConsumerRebalanceListener`.
>
> My test setup is like the following:
> - 5M messages pre-loaded in one node kafka 0.9
> - 12 partitions, auto offset commit set to false
> - in `onPartitionsRevoked`, commit offset and flush the local state
>
> The test run is like the following:
> - launch one process with 2 consumers and let it consume for a while
> - launch another process with 2 consumers, this triggers a rebalancing,
> and let these 2 processes run until messages are all consumed
>
> The code is here: https://gist.github.com/darkjh/fe1e5a5387bf13b4d4dd
>
> So at first, the 2 consumers of the first process each got 6 partitions.
> And after the rebalancing, each consumer got 3 partitions. It's confirmed
> by logging inside the `onPartitionAssigned` callback.
>
> But after the rebalancing, one of the 2 consumers of the first process stop
> receiving messages, even if it has partitions assigned to:
>
> balance-1 pulled 7237 msgs ...
> balance-0 pulled 7263 msgs ...
> 2016-01-22 15:50:37,533 [INFO] [pool-1-thread-2]
> o.a.k.c.c.i.AbstractCoordinator - Attempt to heart beat failed since the
> group is rebalancing, try to re-join group.
> balance-1 flush @ 536637
> balance-1 committed offset for List(balance-11, balance-10, balance-9,
> balance-8, balance-7, balance-6)
> 2016-01-22 15:50:37,575 [INFO] [pool-1-thread-1]
> o.a.k.c.c.i.AbstractCoordinator - Attempt to heart beat failed since the
> group is rebalancing, try to re-join group.
> balance-0 flush @ 543845
> balance-0 committed offset for List(balance-5, balance-4, balance-3,
> balance-2, balance-1, balance-0)
> balance-0 got assigned List(balance-5, balance-4, balance-3)
> balance-1 got assigned List(balance-11, balance-10, balance-9)
> balance-1 pulled 3625 msgs ...
> balance-0 pulled 3621 msgs ...
> balance-0 pulled 3631 msgs ...
> balance-0 pulled 3631 msgs ...
> balance-1 pulled 0 msgs ...
> balance-0 pulled 3643 msgs ...
> balance-0 pulled 3643 msgs ...
> balance-1 pulled 0 msgs ...
> balance-0 pulled 3622 msgs ...
> balance-0 pulled 3632 msgs ...
> balance-1 pulled 0 msgs ...
> balance-0 pulled 3637 msgs ...
> balance-0 pulled 3641 msgs ...
> balance-0 pulled 3640 msgs ...
> balance-1 pulled 0 msgs ...
> balance-0 pulled 3632 msgs ...
> balance-0 pulled 3630 msgs ...
> balance-1 pulled 0 msgs ...
> ......
>
> `balance-0` and `balance-1` are the names of the consumer thread. So after
> the rebalancing, thread `balance-1` continues to poll but no message
> arrive, given that it has got 3 partitions assigned to after the
> rebalancing.
>
> Finally other 3 consumers pulls all their partitions' message, the
> situation is like
>
> GROUP, TOPIC, PARTITION, CURRENT OFFSET, LOG END OFFSET, LAG, OWNER
> balance-test, balance, 9, 417467, 417467, 0, consumer-2_/127.0.0.1
> balance-test, balance, 10, 417467, 417467, 0, consumer-2_/127.0.0.1
> balance-test, balance, 11, 417467, 417467, 0, consumer-2_/127.0.0.1
> balance-test, balance, 6, 180269, 417467, 237198, consumer-2_/127.0.0.1
> balance-test, balance, 7, 180036, 417468, 237432, consumer-2_/127.0.0.1
> balance-test, balance, 8, 180197, 417467, 237270, consumer-2_/127.0.0.1
> balance-test, balance, 3, 417467, 417467, 0, consumer-1_/127.0.0.1
> balance-test, balance, 4, 417468, 417468, 0, consumer-1_/127.0.0.1
> balance-test, balance, 5, 417468, 417468, 0, consumer-1_/127.0.0.1
> balance-test, balance, 0, 417467, 417467, 0, consumer-1_/127.0.0.1
> balance-test, balance, 1, 417467, 417467, 0, consumer-1_/127.0.0.1
> balance-test, balance, 2, 417467, 417467, 0, consumer-1_/127.0.0.1
>
> So you can see, partition [6, 7, 8] still has messages, but the consumer
> can't pull them after the rebalancing.
>
> I've tried 0.9.0.0 release, trunk and 0.9.0 branch, for both server/broker
> and client.
>
> I hope the code is clear enough to illustrate/reproduce the problem. It's
> quite a surprise for me because this is the main feature of the new
> consumer API, but it does not seem to work properly.
> Feel free to talk to me for any details.
> --
> *JU Han*
>
> Software Engineer @ Teads.tv
>
> +33 0619608888
