I think the point is that we should ideally try to cover all these in the "upgrade" notes.
-Jay On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 10:37 AM, Aditya Auradkar <aaurad...@linkedin.com> wrote: > Rajiv, > > By default, the quota is unlimited until you decide to configure them > explicitly. > And yes, we did get rid of "replica.lag.max.messages", so that > configuration will no longer apply. > > Aditya > > On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 10:24 AM, Todd Snyder <tsny...@blackberry.com> > wrote: > > > The quota page is here: > > http://kafka.apache.org/documentation.html#design_quotas > > > > "By default, each unique client-id receives a fixed quota in bytes/sec as > > configured by the cluster (quota.producer.default, > quota.consumer.default)" > > > > > > I also noticed there's been a change in the replication configuration > > while reading: > > > http://www.confluent.io/blog/hands-free-kafka-replication-a-lesson-in-operational-simplicity/ > > > > It may not break anything, but it may impact how you decide to configure > > and monitor replication > > > > "Now there is only one value you need to configure on the server which is > > replica.lag.time.max.ms. The interpretation of this has changed to be > the > > time for which a replica has been out-of-sync with the leader. Stuck or > > failed replicas are detected the same way as before - if a replica fails > to > > send a fetch request for longer than replica.lag.time.max.ms, it is > > considered dead and is removed from the ISR. The mechanism of detecting > > slow replicas has changed - if a replica starts lagging behind the leader > > for longer than replica.lag.time.max.ms, then it is considered too slow > > and is removed from the ISR. So even if there is a spike in traffic and > > large batches of messages are written on the leader, unless the replica > > consistently remains behind the leader for replica.lag.time.max.ms, it > > will not shuffle in and out of the ISR." > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Rajiv Kurian [mailto:ra...@signalfx.com] > > Sent: Tuesday, December 01, 2015 11:57 > > To: users@kafka.apache.org > > Subject: Re: Any gotchas upgrading to 0.9? > > > > Also I remember reading (can't find now) something about default traffic > > quotas. I'd hope the default quotas are very large (infinite?) and not > > small so that compatibility is maintained. It would be very unfortunate > if > > some of our traffic was throttled because of the upgrade because of magic > > defaults. For example we have a certain cluster dedicated to serving a > > single important topic and we'd hate for it to be throttled because of > > incorrect defaults. > > > > Thanks, > > Rajiv > > > > On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 8:54 AM, Rajiv Kurian <ra...@signalfx.com> wrote: > > > > > I saw the upgrade path documentation at > > > http://kafka.apache.org/documentation.html and that kind of answers > (1). > > > Not sure if there is anything about client compatibility though. > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 8:51 AM, Rajiv Kurian <ra...@signalfx.com> > wrote: > > > > > >> I plan to upgrade both the server and clients to 0.9. Had a few > > questions > > >> before I went ahead with the upgrade: > > >> > > >> 1. Do all brokers need to be on 0.9? Currently we are running 0.8.2. > > We'd > > >> ideally like to convert only a few brokers to 0.9 and only if we don't > > see > > >> problems convert the rest. > > >> > > >> 2. Is it possible to run Kafka 0.9 clients (specifically the consumer) > > >> with Kafka 0.8.2 brokers? > > >> > > >> Any link to the upgrade path would be really useful. > > >> > > >> Thanks, > > >> Rajiv > > >> > > > > > > > > >
