Forgot to mention is that the Kafka version we're using is from Aug's Trunk
branch---which has the SSL support.

Thanks again,
Qi


On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 2:29 PM, Qi Xu <shkir...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Loop another guy from our team.
>
> On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 2:26 PM, Qi Xu <shkir...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi folks,
>> We have a 10 node cluster and have several topics. Each topic has about
>> 256 partitions with 3 replica factor. Now we run into an issue that in some
>> topic, a few partition (< 10)'s leader is -1 and all of them has only one
>> synced partition.
>>
>> From the Kafka manager, here's the snapshot:
>> [image: Inline image 2]
>>
>> [image: Inline image 1]
>>
>> here's the state log:
>> [2015-11-23 21:57:58,598] ERROR Controller 1 epoch 435499 initiated state
>> change for partition [userlogs,84] from OnlinePartition to OnlinePartition
>> failed (state.change.logger)
>> kafka.common.StateChangeFailedException: encountered error while electing
>> leader for partition [userlogs,84] due to: Preferred replica 0 for
>> partition [userlogs,84] is either not alive or not in the isr. Current
>> leader and ISR: [{"leader":-1,"leader_epoch":203,"isr":[1]}].
>> Caused by: kafka.common.StateChangeFailedException: Preferred replica 0
>> for partition [userlogs,84] is either not alive or not in the isr. Current
>> leader and ISR: [{"leader":-1,"leader_epoch":203,"isr":[1]}]
>>
>> My question is:
>> 1) how could this happen and how can I fix it or work around it?
>> 2) Is 256 partitions too big? We have about 200+ cores for spark
>> streaming job.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Qi
>>
>>
>

Reply via email to