I agree: keep it simple :)  The latest stable version of Kafka right now has a 
critical bug in it.  Fixing that would be good enough.  0.8.2.2 should probably 
just a maintenance/bugfix release.


> On Aug 18, 2015, at 14:29, Edward Ribeiro <edward.ribe...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> I sort of follow Daniel Nelson on this issue: cut a 0.8.2.2 but not include
> much thing besides Snappy fixes. I mean, include a couple of additional
> critical bug fixes, if really urgent, and that's it.
> 
> On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 3:25 PM, Daniel Nelson <daniel.nel...@vungle.com>
> wrote:
> 
>> I am strongly in favor of cutting a 0.8.2.2 release, but I don’t think
>> that it needs to include anything other than the fix for Snappy that kicked
>> off this discussion in the first place. If there are additional critical
>> issues that can be included without delaying the process, I see no downside.
>> 
>>> On Aug 18, 2015, at 10:54 AM, Neha Narkhede <n...@confluent.io> wrote:
>>> 
>>> How about looking at the scope for the 0.8.3 release first before we cut
>>> yet another point release off of 0.8.2.2? Each release includes some
>>> overhead and if there is a larger release in the works, it might be worth
>>> working on getting that. My take is that the 2 things the community has
>>> been waiting for is SSL support and the new consumer and we have been
>>> promising to get 0.8.3 with both those features for several months now.
>>> 
>>> Looking at the progress on both, it seems we are very close to getting
>> both
>>> those checked in and it looks like we should get there in another 5-6
>>> weeks. Furthermore, both of these features are large and I anticipate us
>>> receiving feedback and bugs that will require a couple of point releases
>> on
>>> top of 0.8.3 anyway. One possibility is to work on 0.8.3 together now and
>>> get the community to use the newly released features, gather feedback and
>>> do point releases incorporating that feedback and iterate on it.
>>> 
>>> We could absolutely do both 0.8.2.2 and 0.8.3. What I'd ask for is for us
>>> to look at the 0.8.3 timeline too and make a call whether 0.8.2.2 still
>>> makes sense.
>>> 
>>> Thanks,
>>> Neha
>>> 
>>> On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 10:24 AM, Gwen Shapira <g...@confluent.io>
>> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> Thanks Jun.
>>>> 
>>>> I updated the list with your suggestions.
>>>> If anyone feels we are missing a critical patch for 0.8.2.2, please
>> speak
>>>> up.
>>>> 
>>>> Gwen
>>>> 
>>>> On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 5:40 PM, Jun Rao <j...@confluent.io> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> Hi, Grant,
>>>>> 
>>>>> I took a look at that list. None of those is really critical as you
>> said.
>>>>> So, I'd suggest that we not include those to minimize the scope of the
>>>>> release.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>> 
>>>>> Jun
>>>>> 
>>>>> On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 5:16 PM, Grant Henke <ghe...@cloudera.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>>> Thanks Gwen.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> I updated a few small things on the wiki page.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Below is a list of jiras I think could also be marked as included. All
>>>> of
>>>>>> these, though not super critical, seem like fairly small and low risk
>>>>>> changes that help avoid potentially confusing issues or errors for
>>>> users.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> KAFKA-2012
>>>>>> KAFKA-972
>>>>>> KAFKA-2337 & KAFKA-2393
>>>>>> KAFKA-1867
>>>>>> KAFKA-2407
>>>>>> KAFKA-2234
>>>>>> KAFKA-1866
>>>>>> KAFKA-2345 & KAFKA-2355
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> thoughts?
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Thank you,
>>>>>> Grant
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 4:56 PM, Gwen Shapira <g...@confluent.io>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Thanks for creating a list, Grant!
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> I placed it on the wiki with a quick evaluation of the content and
>>>>>> whether
>>>>>>> it should be in 0.8.2.2:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/Proposed+patches+for+0.8.2.2
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> I'm attempting to only cherrypick fixes that are both important for
>>>>> large
>>>>>>> number of users (or very critical to some users) and very safe
>>>> (mostly
>>>>>>> judged by the size of the change, but not only)
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> If your favorite bugfix is missing from the list, or is there but
>>>>> marked
>>>>>>> "No", please let us know (in this thread) what we are missing and why
>>>>> it
>>>>>> is
>>>>>>> both important and safe.
>>>>>>> Also, if I accidentally included something you consider unsafe, speak
>>>>> up!
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Gwen
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 8:17 AM, Grant Henke <ghe...@cloudera.com>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> +dev
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Adding dev list back in. Somehow it got dropped.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 10:16 AM, Grant Henke <ghe...@cloudera.com
>>>>> 
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> Below is a list of candidate bug fix jiras marked fixed for
>>>> 0.8.3.
>>>>> I
>>>>>>>> don't
>>>>>>>>> suspect all of these will (or should) make it into the release
>>>> but
>>>>>> this
>>>>>>>>> should be a relatively complete list to work from:
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>  - KAFKA-2114 <
>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-2114
>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>> Unable
>>>>>>>>>  to change min.insync.replicas default
>>>>>>>>>  - KAFKA-1702 <
>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-1702
>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>  Messages silently Lost by producer
>>>>>>>>>  - KAFKA-2012 <
>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-2012
>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>  Broker should automatically handle corrupt index files
>>>>>>>>>  - KAFKA-2406 <
>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-2406
>>>>>> :
>>>>>>> ISR
>>>>>>>>>  propagation should be throttled to avoid overwhelming
>>>>> controller.
>>>>>>>>>  - KAFKA-2336 <
>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-2336
>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>  Changing offsets.topic.num.partitions after the offset topic
>>>> is
>>>>>>>> created
>>>>>>>>>  breaks consumer group partition assignment
>>>>>>>>>  - KAFKA-2337 <
>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-2337
>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>> Verify
>>>>>>>>>  that metric names will not collide when creating new topics
>>>>>>>>>  - KAFKA-2393 <
>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-2393
>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>  Correctly Handle InvalidTopicException in
>>>>>>> KafkaApis.getTopicMetadata()
>>>>>>>>>  - KAFKA-2189 <
>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-2189
>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>> Snappy
>>>>>>>>>  compression of message batches less efficient in 0.8.2.1
>>>>>>>>>  - KAFKA-2308 <
>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-2308
>>>>>> :
>>>>>>> New
>>>>>>>>>  producer + Snappy face un-compression errors after broker
>>>>> restart
>>>>>>>>>  - KAFKA-2042 <
>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-2042
>>>>>> :
>>>>>>> New
>>>>>>>>>  producer metadata update always get all topics.
>>>>>>>>>  - KAFKA-1367 <
>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-1367
>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>> Broker
>>>>>>>>>  topic metadata not kept in sync with ZooKeeper
>>>>>>>>>  - KAFKA-972 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-972
>>>>> :
>>>>>>>> MetadataRequest
>>>>>>>>>  returns stale list of brokers
>>>>>>>>>  - KAFKA-1867 <
>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-1867
>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>> liveBroker
>>>>>>>>>  list not updated on a cluster with no topics
>>>>>>>>>  - KAFKA-1650 <
>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-1650
>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>> Mirror
>>>>>>>>>  Maker could lose data on unclean shutdown.
>>>>>>>>>  - KAFKA-2009 <
>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-2009
>>>>>> :
>>>>>>> Fix
>>>>>>>>>  UncheckedOffset.removeOffset synchronization and trace logging
>>>>>> issue
>>>>>>>> in
>>>>>>>>>  mirror maker
>>>>>>>>>  - KAFKA-2407 <
>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-2407
>>>>>> :
>>>>>>> Only
>>>>>>>>>  create a log directory when it will be used
>>>>>>>>>  - KAFKA-2327 <
>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-2327
>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>  broker doesn't start if config defines advertised.host but not
>>>>>>>>>  advertised.port
>>>>>>>>>  - KAFKA-1788: producer record can stay in RecordAccumulator
>>>>>> forever
>>>>>>> if
>>>>>>>>>  leader is no available
>>>>>>>>>  - KAFKA-2234 <
>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-2234
>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>  Partition reassignment of a nonexistent topic prevents future
>>>>>>>> reassignments
>>>>>>>>>  - KAFKA-2096 <
>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-2096
>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>  Enable keepalive socket option for broker to prevent socket
>>>> leak
>>>>>>>>>  - KAFKA-1057 <
>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-1057
>>>>>> :
>>>>>>> Trim
>>>>>>>>>  whitespaces from user specified configs
>>>>>>>>>  - KAFKA-1641 <
>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-1641
>>>>>> :
>>>>>>> Log
>>>>>>>>>  cleaner exits if last cleaned offset is lower than earliest
>>>>> offset
>>>>>>>>>  - KAFKA-1648 <
>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-1648
>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>> Round
>>>>>>>>>  robin consumer balance throws an NPE when there are no topics
>>>>>>>>>  - KAFKA-1724 <
>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-1724
>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>  Errors after reboot in single node setup
>>>>>>>>>  - KAFKA-1758 <
>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-1758
>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>  corrupt recovery file prevents startup
>>>>>>>>>  - KAFKA-1866 <
>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-1866
>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>  LogStartOffset gauge throws exceptions after log.delete()
>>>>>>>>>  - KAFKA-1883 <
>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-1883
>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>> NullPointerException
>>>>>>>>>  in RequestSendThread
>>>>>>>>>  - KAFKA-1896 <
>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-1896
>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>  Record size funcition of record in mirror maker hit NPE when
>>>> the
>>>>>>>> message
>>>>>>>>>  value is null.
>>>>>>>>>  - KAFKA-2101 <
>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-2101
>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>  Metric metadata-age is reset on a failed update
>>>>>>>>>  - KAFKA-2112 <
>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-2112
>>>>>> :
>>>>>>> make
>>>>>>>>>  overflowWheel volatile
>>>>>>>>>  - KAFKA-2117 <
>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-2117
>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>  OffsetManager uses incorrect field for metadata
>>>>>>>>>  - KAFKA-2164 <
>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-2164
>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>  ReplicaFetcherThread: suspicious log message on reset offset
>>>>>>>>>  - KAFKA-1668 <
>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-1668
>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>  TopicCommand doesn't warn if --topic argument doesn't match
>>>> any
>>>>>>> topics
>>>>>>>>>  - KAFKA-2198 <
>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-2198
>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>  kafka-topics.sh exits with 0 status on failures
>>>>>>>>>  - KAFKA-2235 <
>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-2235
>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>  LogCleaner offset map overflow
>>>>>>>>>  - KAFKA-2241 <
>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-2241
>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>  AbstractFetcherThread.shutdown() should not block on
>>>>>>>>>  ReadableByteChannel.read(buffer)
>>>>>>>>>  - KAFKA-2272 <
>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-2272
>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>  listeners endpoint parsing fails if the hostname has capital
>>>>>> letter
>>>>>>>>>  - KAFKA-2345 <
>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-2345
>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>  Attempt to delete a topic already marked for deletion throws
>>>>>>>>>  ZkNodeExistsException
>>>>>>>>>  - KAFKA-2353 <
>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-2353
>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>  SocketServer.Processor should catch exception and close the
>>>>> socket
>>>>>>>> properly
>>>>>>>>>  in configureNewConnections.
>>>>>>>>>  - KAFKA-1836 <
>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-1836
>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>  metadata.fetch.timeout.ms set to zero blocks forever
>>>>>>>>>  - KAFKA-2317 <
>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-2317
>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>> De-register
>>>>>>>>>  isrChangeNotificationListener on controller resignation
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> Note: KAFKA-2120 <
>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-2120
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> &
>>>>>>>>> KAFKA-2421 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-2421>
>>>> were
>>>>>>>>> mentioned in previous emails, but are not in the list because
>>>> they
>>>>>> are
>>>>>>>> not
>>>>>>>>> committed yet.
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> Hope that helps the effort.
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>>> Grant
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 12:09 AM, Grant Henke <
>>>> ghe...@cloudera.com
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> +1 to that suggestion. Though I suspect that requires a
>>>> committer
>>>>> to
>>>>>>> do.
>>>>>>>>>> Making it part of the standard commit process could work too.
>>>>>>>>>> On Aug 16, 2015 11:01 PM, "Gwen Shapira" <g...@confluent.io>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> BTW. I think it will be great for Apache Kafka to have a 0.8.2
>>>>>>> "release
>>>>>>>>>>> manager" who's role is to cherrypick low-risk bug-fixes into
>>>> the
>>>>>>> 0.8.2
>>>>>>>>>>> branch and once enough bug fixes happened (or if sufficiently
>>>>>>> critical
>>>>>>>>>>> fixes happened) to roll out a new maintenance release (with
>>>>> every 3
>>>>>>>> month
>>>>>>>>>>> as a reasonable bugfix release target).
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> This will add some predictability regarding how fast we release
>>>>>> fixes
>>>>>>>> for
>>>>>>>>>>> bugs.
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> Gwen
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> On Sun, Aug 16, 2015 at 8:09 PM, Jeff Holoman <
>>>>>> jholo...@cloudera.com
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> +1 for the release and also including
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-2114
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> Jeff
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sun, Aug 16, 2015 at 2:51 PM, Stevo Slavić <
>>>>> ssla...@gmail.com
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> +1 (non-binding) for 0.8.2.2 release
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Would be nice to include in that release new producer
>>>>>> resiliency
>>>>>>>> bug
>>>>>>>>>>>> fixes
>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-1788 and
>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-2120
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Aug 14, 2015 at 4:03 PM, Gwen Shapira <
>>>>>> g...@confluent.io
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Will be nice to include Kafka-2308 and fix two critical
>>>>>> snappy
>>>>>>>>>>> issues
>>>>>>>>>>>> in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the maintenance release.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Gwen
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Aug 14, 2015 6:16 AM, "Grant Henke" <
>>>>> ghe...@cloudera.com>
>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Just to clarify. Will KAFKA-2189 be the only patch in
>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>> release?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Aug 14, 2015 at 7:35 AM, Manikumar Reddy <
>>>>>>>>>>>> ku...@nmsworks.co.in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +1  for 0.8.2.2 release
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Aug 14, 2015 at 5:49 PM, Ismael Juma <
>>>>>>>>>>> ism...@juma.me.uk>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I think this is a good idea as the change is
>>>> minimal
>>>>> on
>>>>>>> our
>>>>>>>>>>> side
>>>>>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> has
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> been tested in production for some time by the
>>>>>> reporter.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ismael
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Aug 14, 2015 at 1:15 PM, Jun Rao <
>>>>>>> j...@confluent.io
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi, Everyone,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Since the release of Kafka 0.8.2.1, a number of
>>>>>> people
>>>>>>>> have
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> reported
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> an
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> issue with snappy compression (
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-2189
>>>> ).
>>>>>>>>>>> Basically,
>>>>>>>>>>>> if
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> they
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> use
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> snappy in 0.8.2.1, they will experience a 2-3X
>>>>> space
>>>>>>>>>>> increase.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> The
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> issue
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> has since been fixed in trunk (just a snappy jar
>>>>>>>> upgrade).
>>>>>>>>>>>> Since
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 0.8.3
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> still a few months away, it may make sense to do
>>>> an
>>>>>>>> 0.8.2.2
>>>>>>>>>>>>> release
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> just
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fix this issue. Any objections?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Jun
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Grant Henke
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Software Engineer | Cloudera
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> gr...@cloudera.com | twitter.com/gchenke |
>>>>>>>>>>>> linkedin.com/in/granthenke
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>> Jeff Holoman
>>>>>>>>>>>> Systems Engineer
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>> Grant Henke
>>>>>>>>> Software Engineer | Cloudera
>>>>>>>>> gr...@cloudera.com | twitter.com/gchenke |
>>>>>> linkedin.com/in/granthenke
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>> Grant Henke
>>>>>>>> Software Engineer | Cloudera
>>>>>>>> gr...@cloudera.com | twitter.com/gchenke |
>>>>> linkedin.com/in/granthenke
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Grant Henke
>>>>>> Software Engineer | Cloudera
>>>>>> gr...@cloudera.com | twitter.com/gchenke | linkedin.com/in/granthenke
>>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> --
>>> Thanks,
>>> Neha
>> 
>> 

Reply via email to