Does it still matter whether we are using Ubuntu 14 or 12? On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 8:44 AM, Wesley Chow <w...@chartbeat.com> wrote:
> > A call with Amazon confirmed instability for d2 and c4 instances triggered > by lots of network activity. They fixed the problem and have since rolled > it out. We've been running Kafka with d2's for a little while now and so > far so good. > > Wes > > > On Tue, Jun 2, 2015 at 1:39 PM, Wes Chow <w...@chartbeat.com> wrote: > >> >> We have run d2 instances with Kafka. They're currently unstable -- Amazon >> confirmed a host issue with d2 instances that gets tickled by a Kafka >> workload yesterday. Otherwise, it seems the d2 instance type is ideal as it >> gets an enormous amount of disk throughput and you'll likely be network >> bottlenecked. >> >> Wes >> >> >> Steven Wu <stevenz...@gmail.com> >> June 2, 2015 at 1:07 PM >> EBS (network attached storage) has got a lot better over the last a few >> years. we don't quite trust it for kafka workload. >> >> At Netflix, we were going with the new d2 instance type (HDD). our >> perf/load testing shows it satisfy our workload. SSD is better in latency >> curve but pretty comparable in terms of throughput. we can use the extra >> space from HDD for longer retention period. >> >> On Tue, Jun 2, 2015 at 9:37 AM, Henry Cai <h...@pinterest.com.invalid> >> <h...@pinterest.com.invalid> >> >> Henry Cai <h...@pinterest.com.INVALID> >> June 2, 2015 at 12:37 PM >> We have been hosting kafka brokers in Amazon EC2 and we are using EBS >> disk. But periodically we were hit by long I/O wait time on EBS in some >> Availability Zones. >> >> We are thinking to change the instance types to a local HDD or local SSD. >> HDD is cheaper and bigger and seems quite fit for the Kafka use case which >> is mostly sequential read/write, but some early experiments show the HDD >> cannot catch up with the message producing speed since there are many >> topic/partitions on the broker which actually makes the disk I/O more >> randomly accessed. >> >> How are people's experience of choosing disk types on Amazon? >> >> >