It is based on our understanding from reading the documents. We aren't concerned of data duplication as that is going to be handled by elasticsearch.
> On May 1, 2015, at 12:15 AM, Daniel Compton <daniel.compton.li...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > When we evaluated MirrorMaker last year we didn't find any risk of data > loss, only duplicate messages in the case of a network partition. > > Did you discover data loss in your tests, or were you just looking at the > docs? > On Fri, 1 May 2015 at 4:31 pm Jiangjie Qin <j...@linkedin.com.invalid> > wrote: > >> Which mirror maker version did you look at? The MirrorMaker in trunk >> should not have data loss if you just use the default setting. >> >>> On 4/30/15, 7:53 PM, "Joong Lee" <jo...@me.com> wrote: >>> >>> Hi, >>> We are exploring Kafka to keep two data centers (primary and DR) running >>> hosts of elastic search nodes in sync. One key requirement is that we >>> can't lose any data. We POC'd use of MirrorMaker and felt it may not meet >>> out data loss requirement. >>> >>> I would like ask the community if we should look for another solution or >>> would Kafka be the right solution considering zero data loss requirement. >>> >>> Thanks >> >>
