Not sure what you mean by using the SimpleConsumer on failure
recovery. Can you elaborate on this?

On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 03:04:47PM +0000, Suren wrote:
> Haven't used either one now. Sounds like 0.8.2.1 will help.
> We are using the High Level Consumer generally but are thinking to use the 
> SimpleConsumer on failure recovery to set the offsets.
> Is that the recommended approach for this use case?
> Thanks.
> -Suren
>  
> 
>      On Thursday, February 19, 2015 9:40 AM, Joel Koshy <jjkosh...@gmail.com> 
> wrote:
>    
> 
>  Are you using it from Java or Scala? i.e., are you using the
> javaapi.SimpleConsumer or kafka.consumer.SimpleConsumer
> 
> In 0.8.2 javaapi we explicitly set version 0 of the
> OffsetCommitRequest/OffsetFetchRequest which means it will
> commit/fetch to/from ZooKeeper only. If you use the scala API you can
> create an OffsetCommitRequest with version set to 1 (which will allow
> you to commit to Kafka).
> 
> Since we are doing an 0.8.2.1 release we will make the above more
> consistent. i.e., you can create OffsetCommitRequests with version 1
> even from the javaapi. I will be updating the documentation on this to
> make it clearer.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Joel
> 
> On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 02:28:32PM +0000, Suren wrote:
> > Joel,
> > Looking at SimpleConsumer in the 0.8.2 code, it is using 
> > OffsetCommitRequest and sending that over to a broker.
> > Is the broker storing that in ZK?
> > -Suren
> >  
> > 
> >      On Tuesday, February 17, 2015 12:22 PM, Joel Koshy 
> ><jjkosh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >    
> > 
> >  Hi Chris,
> > 
> > In 0.8.2, the simple consumer Java API supports committing/fetching
> > offsets that are stored in ZooKeeper. You don't need to issue any
> > ConsumerMetadataRequest for this. Unfortunately, the API currently
> > does not support fetching offsets that are stored in Kafka.
> > 
> > Thanks,
> > 
> > Joel
> > 
> > On Mon, Feb 16, 2015 at 05:02:08PM -0500, Christopher Piggott wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > > 
> > > I am still using 0.8.1.1 because of the CPU use concerns.
> > > 
> > > I'm confused about why the SimpleConsumer has:
> > > 
> > > OffsetCommitResponse commitOffsets(OffsetCommitRequest request)
> > > 
> > > and
> > > 
> > > OffsetFetchResponse fetchOffsets(OffsetFetchRequest request)
> > > 
> > > but no way that I can see to issue a ConsumerMetadataRequest, which is
> > > what I think when restarting my consumers so that they can begin
> > > working where they last left off (in the event that they were stopped
> > > for a while then restarted some time later, and new messages had come
> > > in).
> > > 
> > > The fetchOffsets() works on time, usually it looks like you send it
> > > Earliest or Latest (beginning or end of what's currently in the
> > > stream).
> > > 
> > > I realize the documentation says this:
> > > 
> > > 
> > > > *Downsides of using SimpleConsumer*The SimpleConsumer does require a 
> > > > significant amount of work not needed in the Consumer Groups:
> > > >
> > > >    1. You must keep track of the offsets in your application to know 
> > > >where you left off consuming.
> > > >
> > > > But that's not really quite true ... not as long as commitOffsets() has 
> > > > been provided.  It seems the SimpleConsumer provides you with a 
> > > > solution to only one half of the problem of offset management.
> > > 
> > > Using some zookeeper python scripts I wrote I can see that the
> > > commitOffsets() is doing its job and writing to
> > > 
> > > 
> > > /consumers/myGroupId/offsets/myTopic/0
> > > 
> > > 
> > > That has this value:
> > > 
> > > ('32757408', ZnodeStat(czxid=2211679, mzxid=14779964, ctime=1423777630972,
> > > > mtime=1424122117397, version=12568262, cversion=0, aversion=0,
> > > > ephemeralOwner=0, dataLength=8, numChildren=0, pzxid=2211679))
> > > 
> > > 
> > > Now the question is just how to retrieve that - do I really have to
> > > have my client connect to ZK directly?  If that's the case, future
> > > upgrades would break (e.g. 0.8.2 having its own storage for commit
> > > watermarks).
> > > 
> > > 
> > > What was the intent here, and what's the advice on how to proceed
> > > being that 0.8.2 is in an iffy state right now?
> > > 
> > > 
> > > --Chris
> > 
> > 
> > 
> >    
> 
> 
> 
>    

Reply via email to