Allen, which version of Kafka are you using? And if you have multiple
brokers, is there a controller migration happened before?

Guozhang

On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 3:56 PM, Allen Wang <aw...@netflix.com.invalid>
wrote:

> Hello,
>
> We tried the ReassignPartitionsCommand to move partitions to new brokers.
> The execution initially showed message "Successfully started reassignment
> of partitions ...". But when I tried to verify using --verify option, it
> reported some reassignments have failed:
>
> ERROR: Assigned replicas (0,5,2) don't match the list of replicas for
> reassignment (0,5) for partition [vhs_playback_event,1]
> ERROR: Assigned replicas (4,5,0,2) don't match the list of replicas for
> reassignment (4,5) for partition [vhs_playback_event,11]
> ERROR: Assigned replicas (3,5,0,2) don't match the list of replicas for
> reassignment (3,5) for partition [vhs_playback_event,16]
>
> I noticed that the assigned replicas in the error messages include both old
> assignment and new assignment. Is this a real error or just means
> partitions are being copied and current state does not match the final
> expected state?
>
> Since I was confused by the errors, I ran the same
> ReassignPartitionsCommand with the same assignment again but got some
> additional failure messages complaining that three partitions do not exist:
>
> [2015-01-23 18:15:41,333] ERROR Skipping reassignment of partition
> [vhs_playback_event,16] since it doesn't exist
> (kafka.admin.ReassignPartitionsCommand)
> [2015-01-23 18:15:41,455] ERROR Skipping reassignment of partition
> [vhs_playback_event,15] since it doesn't exist
> (kafka.admin.ReassignPartitionsCommand)
> [2015-01-23 18:15:41,499] ERROR Skipping reassignment of partition
> [vhs_playback_event,17] since it doesn't exist
> (kafka.admin.ReassignPartitionsCommand)
>
> These partitions later reappeared from the output of --verify.
>
> The other thing is that at one point the BytesOut from one broker exceeds
> 100Mbytes, which is quite alarming.
>
> In the end, the reassignment was done according to the input file to
> ReassignPartitionsCommand. But the UnderReplicatedPartitions for the
> brokers keeps showing a positive number, even though the output of describe
> topic command and ZooKeeper data show the ISRs are all in sync, and
> Replica-MaxLag is 0.
>
> To sum up, the overall execution is successful but the error messages are
> quite noisy and the metric is not consistent with what appears to be.
>
> Does anyone have the similar experience and is there anything we can do get
> it done smoother? What can we do to reset the inconsistent
> UnderReplicatedPartitions metric?
>
> Thanks,
> Allen
>



-- 
-- Guozhang

Reply via email to