I checked topic config, isr changes dynamically.

root@voluminous-mass:/srv/kafka# bin/kafka-topics.sh --describe --zookeeper
10.100.98.101:2181 --topic test-rep-three
Topic:test-rep-three    PartitionCount:8        ReplicationFactor:3
Configs:
        Topic: test-rep-three   Partition: 0    Leader: 100     Replicas:
100,102,101   Isr: 100
        Topic: test-rep-three   Partition: 1    Leader: 100     Replicas:
101,100,102   Isr: 100,101,102
        Topic: test-rep-three   Partition: 2    Leader: 102     Replicas:
102,101,100   Isr: 101,102
        Topic: test-rep-three   Partition: 3    Leader: 100     Replicas:
100,101,102   Isr: 100
        Topic: test-rep-three   Partition: 4    Leader: 100     Replicas:
101,102,100   Isr: 100
        Topic: test-rep-three   Partition: 5    Leader: 102     Replicas:
102,100,101   Isr: 100,102,101
        Topic: test-rep-three   Partition: 6    Leader: 100     Replicas:
100,102,101   Isr: 100,102,101
        Topic: test-rep-three   Partition: 7    Leader: 100     Replicas:
101,100,102   Isr: 100
root@voluminous-mass:/srv/kafka# bin/kafka-topics.sh --describe --zookeeper
10.100.98.101:2181 --topic test-rep-three
Topic:test-rep-three    PartitionCount:8        ReplicationFactor:3
Configs:
        Topic: test-rep-three   Partition: 0    Leader: 100     Replicas:
100,102,101   Isr: 102,100,101
        Topic: test-rep-three   Partition: 1    Leader: 101     Replicas:
101,100,102   Isr: 101,102,100
        Topic: test-rep-three   Partition: 2    Leader: 102     Replicas:
102,101,100   Isr: 101,102
        Topic: test-rep-three   Partition: 3    Leader: 100     Replicas:
100,101,102   Isr: 101,100,102
        Topic: test-rep-three   Partition: 4    Leader: 101     Replicas:
101,102,100   Isr: 101,102,100
        Topic: test-rep-three   Partition: 5    Leader: 102     Replicas:
102,100,101   Isr: 102,101,100
        Topic: test-rep-three   Partition: 6    Leader: 102     Replicas:
100,102,101   Isr: 102,101
        Topic: test-rep-three   Partition: 7    Leader: 101     Replicas:
101,100,102   Isr: 101,100,102

Why that happen?

thanks


On Wed, Jan 7, 2015 at 12:21 PM, Sa Li <sal...@gmail.com> wrote:

> see this type of error again, back to normal in few secs
>
> [2015-01-07 20:19:49,744] WARN Error in I/O with harmful-jar.master/
> 10.100.98.102 (org.apache.kafka.common.network.Selector)
> java.net.ConnectException: Connection refused
>         at sun.nio.ch.SocketChannelImpl.checkConnect(Native Method)
>         at
> sun.nio.ch.SocketChannelImpl.finishConnect(SocketChannelImpl.java:739)
>         at org.apache.kafka.common.network.Selector.poll(Selector.java:232)
>         at
> org.apache.kafka.clients.NetworkClient.poll(NetworkClient.java:191)
>         at
> org.apache.kafka.clients.producer.internals.Sender.run(Sender.java:184)
>         at
> org.apache.kafka.clients.producer.internals.Sender.run(Sender.java:115)
>         at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:745)
> [2015-01-07 20:19:49,754] WARN Error in I/O with harmful-jar.master/
> 10.100.98.102 (org.apache.kafka.common.network.Selector)
> java.net.ConnectException: Connection refused
>         at sun.nio.ch.SocketChannelImpl.checkConnect(Native Method)
>         at
> sun.nio.ch.SocketChannelImpl.finishConnect(SocketChannelImpl.java:739)
>         at org.apache.kafka.common.network.Selector.poll(Selector.java:232)
>         at
> org.apache.kafka.clients.NetworkClient.poll(NetworkClient.java:191)
>         at
> org.apache.kafka.clients.producer.internals.Sender.run(Sender.java:184)
>         at
> org.apache.kafka.clients.producer.internals.Sender.run(Sender.java:115)
>         at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:745)
> [2015-01-07 20:19:49,764] WARN Error in I/O with harmful-jar.master/
> 10.100.98.102 (org.apache.kafka.common.network.Selector)
> java.net.ConnectException: Connection refused
>         at sun.nio.ch.SocketChannelImpl.checkConnect(Native Method)
>         at
> sun.nio.ch.SocketChannelImpl.finishConnect(SocketChannelImpl.java:739)
>         at org.apache.kafka.common.network.Selector.poll(Selector.java:232)
>         at
> org.apache.kafka.clients.NetworkClient.poll(NetworkClient.java:191)
>         at
> org.apache.kafka.clients.producer.internals.Sender.run(Sender.java:184)
>         at
> org.apache.kafka.clients.producer.internals.Sender.run(Sender.java:115)
>         at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:745)
> 160403 records sent, 32080.6 records/sec (91.78 MB/sec), 507.0 ms avg
> latency, 2418.0 max latency.
> 109882 records sent, 21976.4 records/sec (62.87 MB/sec), 672.7 ms avg
> latency, 3529.0 max latency.
> 100315 records sent, 19995.0 records/sec (57.21 MB/sec), 774.8 ms avg
> latency, 3858.0 max latency.
>
> On Wed, Jan 7, 2015 at 12:07 PM, Sa Li <sal...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi, All
>>
>> I am doing performance test by
>>
>> bin/kafka-run-class.sh org.apache.kafka.clients.tools.ProducerPerformance
>> test-rep-three 500000000 100 -1 acks=1 bootstrap.servers=
>> 10.100.98.100:9092,10.100.98.101:9092,10.100.98.102:9092
>> buffer.memory=67108864 batch.size=8196
>>
>> where the topic test-rep-three is described as follow:
>>
>> bin/kafka-topics.sh --describe --zookeeper 10.100.98.101:2181 --topic
>> test-rep-three
>> Topic:test-rep-three    PartitionCount:8        ReplicationFactor:3
>> Configs:
>>         Topic: test-rep-three   Partition: 0    Leader: 100     Replicas:
>> 100,102,101   Isr: 102,101,100
>>         Topic: test-rep-three   Partition: 1    Leader: 101     Replicas:
>> 101,100,102   Isr: 102,101,100
>>         Topic: test-rep-three   Partition: 2    Leader: 102     Replicas:
>> 102,101,100   Isr: 101,102,100
>>         Topic: test-rep-three   Partition: 3    Leader: 100     Replicas:
>> 100,101,102   Isr: 101,100,102
>>         Topic: test-rep-three   Partition: 4    Leader: 101     Replicas:
>> 101,102,100   Isr: 102,100,101
>>         Topic: test-rep-three   Partition: 5    Leader: 102     Replicas:
>> 102,100,101   Isr: 100,102,101
>>         Topic: test-rep-three   Partition: 6    Leader: 102     Replicas:
>> 100,102,101   Isr: 102,101,100
>>         Topic: test-rep-three   Partition: 7    Leader: 101     Replicas:
>> 101,100,102   Isr: 101,100,102
>>
>> Apparently, it produces the messages and run for a while, but it
>> periodically have such exceptions:
>>
>> org.apache.kafka.common.errors.NotLeaderForPartitionException: This
>> server is not the leader for that topic-partition.
>> org.apache.kafka.common.errors.NotLeaderForPartitionException: This
>> server is not the leader for that topic-partition.
>> org.apache.kafka.common.errors.NotLeaderForPartitionException: This
>> server is not the leader for that topic-partition.
>> org.apache.kafka.common.errors.NotLeaderForPartitionException: This
>> server is not the leader for that topic-partition.
>> org.apache.kafka.common.errors.NotLeaderForPartitionException: This
>> server is not the leader for that topic-partition.
>> org.apache.kafka.common.errors.NotLeaderForPartitionException: This
>> server is not the leader for that topic-partition.
>> org.apache.kafka.common.errors.NotLeaderForPartitionException: This
>> server is not the leader for that topic-partition.
>> org.apache.kafka.common.errors.NotLeaderForPartitionException: This
>> server is not the leader for that topic-partition.
>> org.apache.kafka.common.errors.NotLeaderForPartitionException: This
>> server is not the leader for that topic-partition.
>> org.apache.kafka.common.errors.NotLeaderForPartitionException: This
>> server is not the leader for that topic-partition.
>> org.apache.kafka.common.errors.NotLeaderForPartitionException: This
>> server is not the leader for that topic-partition.
>> 141292 records sent, 28258.4 records/sec (80.85 MB/sec), 551.2 ms avg
>> latency, 1494.0 max latency.
>> 142526 records sent, 28505.2 records/sec (81.55 MB/sec), 580.8 ms avg
>> latency, 1513.0 max latency.
>> 146564 records sent, 29312.8 records/sec (83.86 MB/sec), 557.9 ms avg
>> latency, 1431.0 max latency.
>> 146755 records sent, 29351.0 records/sec (83.97 MB/sec), 556.7 ms avg
>> latency, 1480.0 max latency.
>> 147963 records sent, 29592.6 records/sec (84.67 MB/sec), 556.7 ms avg
>> latency, 1546.0 max latency.
>> 146931 records sent, 29386.2 records/sec (84.07 MB/sec), 550.9 ms avg
>> latency, 1715.0 max latency.
>> 146947 records sent, 29389.4 records/sec (84.08 MB/sec), 555.1 ms avg
>> latency, 1750.0 max latency.
>> 146422 records sent, 29284.4 records/sec (83.78 MB/sec), 557.9 ms avg
>> latency, 1818.0 max latency.
>> 147516 records sent, 29503.2 records/sec (84.41 MB/sec), 555.6 ms avg
>> latency, 1806.0 max latency.
>> 147877 records sent, 29575.4 records/sec (84.62 MB/sec), 552.1 ms avg
>> latency, 1821.0 max latency.
>> 147201 records sent, 29440.2 records/sec (84.23 MB/sec), 554.5 ms avg
>> latency, 1826.0 max latency.
>> 148317 records sent, 29663.4 records/sec (84.87 MB/sec), 558.1 ms avg
>> latency, 1792.0 max latency.
>> 147756 records sent, 29551.2 records/sec (84.55 MB/sec), 550.9 ms avg
>> latency, 1806.0 max latency
>>
>> then back into correct process state, is that because rebalance?
>>
>> thanks
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>>
>> Alec Li
>>
>
>
>
> --
>
> Alec Li
>



-- 

Alec Li

Reply via email to