Hi Neha,

Thanks for your reply.

Now using MM tool to replicate data between Kafka clusters, But I am facing
one problem, Messages gets duplicated if MM killed forcefully[ *kill -9* ].

Is there any solution to avoid this duplicated entry in target cluster? I
am using Kafka


*8.1.1.*

On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 11:17 PM, Neha Narkhede <n...@confluent.io> wrote:

> Hi Madhukar,
>
> From the same documentation link you referred to -
>
> The source and destination clusters are completely independent entities:
> > they can have different numbers of partitions and the offsets will not be
> > the same. For this reason the mirror cluster is not really intended as a
> > fault-tolerance mechanism (as the consumer position will be different);
> for
> > that we recommend using normal in-cluster replication. The mirror maker
> > process will, however, retain and use the message key for partitioning so
> > order is preserved on a per-key basis.
>
>
> There is no way to setup an *exact* Kafka mirror yet.
>
> Thanks,
> Neha
>
> On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 7:47 AM, Madhukar Bharti <bhartimadhu...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I am going to setup Kafka clusters having 3 brokers in Datacenter 1.
> Topics
> > can be created time to time. Each topic can have varying partitions
> mostly
> > 1,10 or 20. Each application might have different partitioning algorithm
> > that we don't know(let it be hidden from ops team).
> >
> > We want to setup mirror maker tool in such a way so that, the exact
> > partitioned data should go to the same partition without knowing the
> Topics
> > partition logic and it should be *generalized*. [This should be common
> for
> > all Topics.]
> >
> > *like partition 0 at DataCenter1 should be exact mirror of  partition-0
> in
> > Datacenter2*.
> >
> > Please suggest me a solution for doing so. If MirrorMaker
> > <http://kafka.apache.org/documentation.html#basic_ops_mirror_maker> tool
> > provide any configurations which solve this use-case please let me know.
> >
> >
> >
> > Regards,
> > Madhukar Bharti
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Thanks,
> Neha
>


--
Thanks and Regards,
Madhukar Bharti

Reply via email to