Guozhang,
I can see message keep coming, meaning messages are being consumed, right?
But the lag is pretty huge (average 30m messages behind) as you can see
from the graph:
https://www.dropbox.com/s/xli25zicxv5f2qa/Screenshot%202014-11-05%2015.23.05.png?dl=0

My understanding is that for such light weight thread, the consumer should
almost be at the same pace with the producer. I also checked the machine
metrics, and nothing pegged there.

I am also moving the testing application to a separate dev cluster. In your
experience, what things might cause the slow reading? Is this more like a
server side thing, or consumer side?

Chen

On Wed, Nov 5, 2014 at 3:10 PM, Guozhang Wang <wangg...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Chen,
>
> Your configs seems fine.
>
> Could you use ConsumerOffsetChecker tool to see if the offset is advancing
> at all (i.e. messages are comsumed), and if yes get some thread dumps and
> check if your consumer is blocked on some locks?
>
> Guozhang
>
> On Wed, Nov 5, 2014 at 2:01 PM, Chen Wang <chen.apache.s...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Hey Guys,
> > I have a really simply storm topology with a kafka spout, reading from
> > kafka through high level consumer. Since the topic has 30 partitions, we
> > have 30 threads in the spout reading from it. However, it seems that the
> > lag keeps increasing even the thread only read the message and do
> nothing.
> > The largest message size  are around 30KB, and the incoming rate can be
> as
> > hight as 14k/seconds. There are 3 brokers on some high config bare metal
> > machines. The client side config is like this:
> >
> > kafka.config.fetch.message.max.bytes    3145728
> > kafka.config.group.id   spout_readonly
> > kafka.config.rebalance.backoff.ms       6000
> > kafka.config.rebalance.max.retries      6
> > kafka.config.zookeeper.connect  dare-broker00.sv.walmartlabs.com:2181,
> > dare-broker01.sv.walmartlabs.com:2181,
> > dare-broker02.sv.walmartlabs.com:2181
> > kafka.config.zookeeper.session.timeout.ms       60000
> >
> > what could possibly cause this huge lag? Will broker be a bottle neck, or
> > some config need to be adjusted? The server side config is like this:
> >
> > replica.fetch.max.bytes=2097152
> > message.max.bytes=2097152
> > num.network.threads=4
> > num.io.threads=4
> >
> > # The send buffer (SO_SNDBUF) used by the socket server
> > socket.send.buffer.bytes=4194304
> >
> > # The receive buffer (SO_RCVBUF) used by the socket server
> > socket.receive.buffer.bytes=2097152
> >
> > # The maximum size of a request that the socket server will accept
> > (protection against OOM)
> > socket.request.max.bytes=104857600
> >
> > Any help appreciated!
> > Chen
> >
>
>
>
> --
> -- Guozhang
>

Reply via email to