I'm just getting familiar with kafka, currently I just save everything to
all my db's in a single transaction, if any of them fail I roll them all
back. However, this is slowing my app down. So, as I understand it I could
write to kafka, close the transaction, and then it would keep on publishing
out to my databases. I'm not sure what format I would write it in yet, I
guess json

On Fri, Sep 12, 2014 at 7:00 PM, Steve Morin <steve.mo...@gmail.com> wrote:

> What record format are you writing to Kafka with?
>
> > On Sep 12, 2014, at 17:45, Patrick Barker <patrickbarke...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > O, I'm not trying to use it for persistence, I'm wanting to sync 3
> > databases: sql, mongo, graph. I want to publish to kafka and then have it
> > update the db's. I'm wanting to keep this as efficient as possible.
> >
> >> On Fri, Sep 12, 2014 at 6:39 PM, cac...@gmail.com <cac...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >>
> >> I would say that it depends upon what you mean by persistence. I don't
> >> believe Kafka is intended to be your permanent data store, but it would
> >> work if you were basically write once with appropriate query patterns.
> It
> >> would be an odd way to describe it though.
> >>
> >> Christian
> >>
> >>> On Fri, Sep 12, 2014 at 4:05 PM, Stephen Boesch <java...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Hi Patrick,   Kafka can be used at any scale including small ones
> >>> (initially anyways). The issues I ran into personally various issues
> with
> >>> ZooKeeper management and a bug in deleting topics (is that fixed yet?)
> >> In
> >>> any case you might try out Kafka  - given its highly performant,
> >> scalable,
> >>> and flexible backbone.   After that you will have little worry about
> >> scale
> >>> - given Kafka's use within massive web scale deployments.
> >>>
> >>> 2014-09-12 15:18 GMT-07:00 Patrick Barker <patrickbarke...@gmail.com>:
> >>>
> >>>> Hey, I'm new to kafka and I'm trying to get a handle on how it all
> >>> works. I
> >>>> want to integrate polyglot persistence into my application. Kafka
> looks
> >>>> like exactly what I want just on a smaller scale. I am currently only
> >>>> dealing with about 2,000 users, which may grow,  but is kafka a good
> >> use
> >>>> case here, or is there another technology thats better suited?
> >>>>
> >>>> Thanks
> >>
>

Reply via email to