I should mention that the impact of doing so is much higher wrt to taking a hit on performance, on versions < 0.8.1. As long as you're on 0.8.1 or later, it should mostly be fine. You might want to keep a close tab on how your iostat numbers are doing, to be sure.
On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 5:46 PM, Hemanth Yamijala <yhema...@gmail.com> wrote: > Thanks Jun. > > On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 4:13 AM, Jun Rao <jun...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > As long as the I/O load is reasonable, this is probably ok. > > > > Thanks, > > > > Jun > > > > On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 4:59 AM, Hemanth Yamijala <yhema...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > > > Hi folks, > > > > > > In order to meet latency requirements for a system we are building, we > > > tested with different values of the above two parameters and found that > > > settings as low as 100 work best for us, balancing the required > > throughput > > > and latencies. > > > > > > I just wanted to check if 100 is a sane value, notwithstanding we are > > > getting good results in our tests, anything we need to be aware of > while > > > setting to low values like this (apart from the throughput, which we > see > > is > > > OK for us) ? > > > > > > Any experience reports will help. > > > > > > Thanks > > > Hemanth > > > > > >
