How do you set the retention.minutes property? Is it through zk-based
topics tool?

Guozhang


On Mon, Jul 7, 2014 at 3:07 PM, Virendra Pratap Singh <
vpsi...@yahoo-inc.com.invalid> wrote:

> I am running a mixed cluster as I mentioned earlier. 1 broker 0.8.0 and
> the other 0.8.1.1. Should the retention of topics for partitions
> owned/replicated by the broker running 0.8.1.1 not enforce the server
> properties settings as defined for that server.
>
> So this brings an interesting question, in case of heterogeneous
> environment (as is in my case, which system parameters will take
> preference/precedence).
>
> Virendra
>
> On 6/30/14, 9:19 AM, "Guozhang Wang" <wangg...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >The retention.minute property is only introduced in 0.8.1:
> >
> >https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-918
> >
> >if you are running 0.8.0 then it will not be recognized.
> >
> >Guozhang
> >
> >
> >
> >On Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 2:13 PM, Virendra Pratap Singh <
> >vpsi...@yahoo-inc.com.invalid> wrote:
> >
> >> Running a mixed 2 broker cluster. Mixed as in one of the broker1 is
> >> running 0.8.0 and broker2 one 0.8.1.1 (from the apache release link.
> >> Directly using the tar ball, no local build used).
> >>
> >> I have set the log.retention.minutes=10. However the broker is not
> >> honoring the setting. I see its not cleaning the log.dir at all.
> >>
> >> However when I set the log.retention.hours=1, then it starts cleaning
> >>the
> >> log.
> >>
> >> When I have the log.retention.minutes set in the server.properties then
> >>I
> >> see this logged in server.log:
> >>
> >> Š..
> >> [2014-06-27 19:21:06,633] WARN Property log.retention.minutes is not
> >>valid
> >> (kafka.utils.VerifiableProperties)
> >> [2014-06-27 19:21:06,633] WARN Property log.retention.minutes is not
> >>valid
> >> (kafka.utils.VerifiableProperties)
> >> ŠŠ
> >>
> >>
> >> I have set these properties too:
> >>
> >> log.cleaner.enable=true
> >> log.cleanup.policy=delete
> >>
> >>
> >> But I see similar warning logged for these properties too.
> >>
> >> Regards,
> >> Virendra
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> >--
> >-- Guozhang
>
>


-- 
-- Guozhang

Reply via email to