If rebalance succeeded, then those error messages are harmless. Though I
agree we shouldn't log those in the first place.


On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 2:12 PM, Ahmed H. <ahmed.ham...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Unfortunately I do not have the logs on hand anymore, they were cleared
> already.
>
> With that said, I do recall seeing some rebalancing. It attempts to
> rebalance a few times and eventually succeeds. In the past, I have had
> cases where it tries rebalancing 4 times and gives up because it reached
> it's limit. In this particular situation, it didn't totally fail.
>
>
> On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 2:44 PM, Neha Narkhede <neha.narkh...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Do you see something like "begin rebalancing consumer" in your consumer
> > logs? Could you send around the full log4j of the consumer?
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 8:19 AM, Ahmed H. <ahmed.ham...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > > Are you referring to the zookeeper logs? If so, I am seeing a lot of
> > those:
> > >
> > > 2014-06-25 11:15:02 NIOServerCnxn [WARN] caught end of stream exception
> > > EndOfStreamException: Unable to read additional data from client
> > sessionid
> > > 0x146958701700371, likely client has closed socket
> > >  at
> > org.apache.zookeeper.server.NIOServerCnxn.doIO(NIOServerCnxn.java:220)
> > > at
> > >
> > >
> >
> org.apache.zookeeper.server.NIOServerCnxnFactory.run(NIOServerCnxnFactory.java:208)
> > >  at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:724)
> > > 2014-06-25 11:15:02 NIOServerCnxn [WARN] caught end of stream exception
> > > EndOfStreamException: Unable to read additional data from client
> > sessionid
> > > 0x146958701700372, likely client has closed socket
> > >  at
> > org.apache.zookeeper.server.NIOServerCnxn.doIO(NIOServerCnxn.java:220)
> > > at
> > >
> > >
> >
> org.apache.zookeeper.server.NIOServerCnxnFactory.run(NIOServerCnxnFactory.java:208)
> > >  at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:724)
> > > 2014-06-25 11:15:02 NIOServerCnxn [WARN] caught end of stream exception
> > > EndOfStreamException: Unable to read additional data from client
> > sessionid
> > > 0x146958701700374, likely client has closed socket
> > >  at
> > org.apache.zookeeper.server.NIOServerCnxn.doIO(NIOServerCnxn.java:220)
> > > at
> > >
> > >
> >
> org.apache.zookeeper.server.NIOServerCnxnFactory.run(NIOServerCnxnFactory.java:208)
> > >  at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:724)
> > > 2014-06-25 11:15:02 NIOServerCnxn [WARN] caught end of stream exception
> > > EndOfStreamException: Unable to read additional data from client
> > sessionid
> > > 0x146958701700373, likely client has closed socket
> > >  at
> > org.apache.zookeeper.server.NIOServerCnxn.doIO(NIOServerCnxn.java:220)
> > > at
> > >
> > >
> >
> org.apache.zookeeper.server.NIOServerCnxnFactory.run(NIOServerCnxnFactory.java:208)
> > >  at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:724)
> > >
> > >
> > > On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 11:15 AM, Guozhang Wang <wangg...@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hello Ahmed,
> > > >
> > > > Did you see any exceptions on the broker logs?
> > > >
> > > > Guozhang
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 7:47 AM, Ahmed H. <ahmed.ham...@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Hello All,
> > > > >
> > > > > I am seeing this issue very frequently when running a high volume
> of
> > > > > messages through Kafka. It starts off well, and it can go on for
> > > minutes
> > > > > that way, but eventually it reaches a point where the connection to
> > > Kafka
> > > > > dies, then it reconnects and carries on. This repeats more
> frequently
> > > > when
> > > > > I have been sending messages for a while. Basically, the more
> > messages
> > > I
> > > > > send, the more I see this. To give you an idea, a separate process
> is
> > > > > writing about 500k messages to the queue. I see this issue on the
> > > > consumer
> > > > > side that is receiving those messages, after it has received about
> > 60%
> > > of
> > > > > the messages. Here is the stack trace:
> > > > >
> > > > > 10:36:14,238 WARN  [kafka.consumer.ConsumerFetcherThread]
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> (ConsumerFetcherThread-test.queue.default_localhost-1403704698110-71aecd8d-0-0)
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> [ConsumerFetcherThread-test.queue.default_localhost-1403704698110-71aecd8d-0-0],
> > > > > Error in fetch Name: FetchRequest; Version: 0; CorrelationId: 1;
> > > > ClientId:
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> test.queue.default-ConsumerFetcherThread-test.queue_localhost-1403704698110-71aecd8d-0-0;
> > > > > ReplicaId: -1; MaxWait: 100 ms; MinBytes: 1 bytes; RequestInfo:
> > > > > [test.queue.resync,0] ->
> PartitionFetchInfo(0,1048576),[test.queue,0]
> > > ->
> > > > > PartitionFetchInfo(0,1048576):
> > > > java.nio.channels.ClosedByInterruptException
> > > > >  at
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> java.nio.channels.spi.AbstractInterruptibleChannel.end(AbstractInterruptibleChannel.java:202)
> > > > > [rt.jar:1.7.0_25]
> > > > > at sun.nio.ch.SocketChannelImpl.connect(SocketChannelImpl.java:650)
> > > > > [rt.jar:1.7.0_25]
> > > > >  at kafka.network.BlockingChannel.connect(BlockingChannel.scala:57)
> > > > > [kafka_2.9.2-0.8.0-SNAPSHOT.jar:0.8.0-SNAPSHOT]
> > > > > at kafka.consumer.SimpleConsumer.connect(SimpleConsumer.scala:43)
> > > > > [kafka_2.9.2-0.8.0-SNAPSHOT.jar:0.8.0-SNAPSHOT]
> > > > >  at
> kafka.consumer.SimpleConsumer.reconnect(SimpleConsumer.scala:56)
> > > > > [kafka_2.9.2-0.8.0-SNAPSHOT.jar:0.8.0-SNAPSHOT]
> > > > > at
> > kafka.consumer.SimpleConsumer.liftedTree1$1(SimpleConsumer.scala:77)
> > > > > [kafka_2.9.2-0.8.0-SNAPSHOT.jar:0.8.0-SNAPSHOT]
> > > > >  at
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> kafka.consumer.SimpleConsumer.kafka$consumer$SimpleConsumer$$sendRequest(SimpleConsumer.scala:69)
> > > > > [kafka_2.9.2-0.8.0-SNAPSHOT.jar:0.8.0-SNAPSHOT]
> > > > > at
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> kafka.consumer.SimpleConsumer$$anonfun$fetch$1$$anonfun$apply$mcV$sp$1.apply$mcV$sp(SimpleConsumer.scala:108)
> > > > > [kafka_2.9.2-0.8.0-SNAPSHOT.jar:0.8.0-SNAPSHOT]
> > > > >  at
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> kafka.consumer.SimpleConsumer$$anonfun$fetch$1$$anonfun$apply$mcV$sp$1.apply(SimpleConsumer.scala:108)
> > > > > [kafka_2.9.2-0.8.0-SNAPSHOT.jar:0.8.0-SNAPSHOT]
> > > > > at
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> kafka.consumer.SimpleConsumer$$anonfun$fetch$1$$anonfun$apply$mcV$sp$1.apply(SimpleConsumer.scala:108)
> > > > > [kafka_2.9.2-0.8.0-SNAPSHOT.jar:0.8.0-SNAPSHOT]
> > > > >  at kafka.metrics.KafkaTimer.time(KafkaTimer.scala:33)
> > > > > [kafka_2.9.2-0.8.0-SNAPSHOT.jar:0.8.0-SNAPSHOT]
> > > > > at
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> kafka.consumer.SimpleConsumer$$anonfun$fetch$1.apply$mcV$sp(SimpleConsumer.scala:107)
> > > > > [kafka_2.9.2-0.8.0-SNAPSHOT.jar:0.8.0-SNAPSHOT]
> > > > >  at
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> kafka.consumer.SimpleConsumer$$anonfun$fetch$1.apply(SimpleConsumer.scala:107)
> > > > > [kafka_2.9.2-0.8.0-SNAPSHOT.jar:0.8.0-SNAPSHOT]
> > > > > at
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> kafka.consumer.SimpleConsumer$$anonfun$fetch$1.apply(SimpleConsumer.scala:107)
> > > > > [kafka_2.9.2-0.8.0-SNAPSHOT.jar:0.8.0-SNAPSHOT]
> > > > >  at kafka.metrics.KafkaTimer.time(KafkaTimer.scala:33)
> > > > > [kafka_2.9.2-0.8.0-SNAPSHOT.jar:0.8.0-SNAPSHOT]
> > > > > at kafka.consumer.SimpleConsumer.fetch(SimpleConsumer.scala:106)
> > > > > [kafka_2.9.2-0.8.0-SNAPSHOT.jar:0.8.0-SNAPSHOT]
> > > > >  at
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> kafka.server.AbstractFetcherThread.processFetchRequest(AbstractFetcherThread.scala:96)
> > > > > [kafka_2.9.2-0.8.0-SNAPSHOT.jar:0.8.0-SNAPSHOT]
> > > > > at
> > > > >
> > >
> kafka.server.AbstractFetcherThread.doWork(AbstractFetcherThread.scala:88)
> > > > > [kafka_2.9.2-0.8.0-SNAPSHOT.jar:0.8.0-SNAPSHOT]
> > > > >  at kafka.utils.ShutdownableThread.run(ShutdownableThread.scala:51)
> > > > > [kafka_2.9.2-0.8.0-SNAPSHOT.jar:0.8.0-SNAPSHOT]
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Since it starts off working as it should, and only runs into this
> > after
> > > > > some time, I am inclined to believe that this maybe a memory/GC
> > issue?
> > > > Not
> > > > > quite sure.
> > > > >
> > > > > I hope I explained it properly. I am having trouble describing it.
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > -- Guozhang
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to