Yes. All jmx beans start from 0 on broker startup.

Thanks,
Neha


On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 9:42 AM, Tomas Nunez <nu...@pythian.com> wrote:

> Then I guess mi next question is:
> The jmx metric "Kafka -> kafka.BrokerTopicStat.<topic_name> -> MessagesIn"
> counts how many messages went in that topic since kafka was started, and it
> will reset to 0 when I restart the service, right?
>
> Same thing for Kafka -> kafka.BrokerAllTopicStat -> MessagesIn, right?
>
> Thanks!
>
>
> On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 5:35 PM, Tomas Nunez <nu...@pythian.com> wrote:
>
> > Yup... I read both of them, but I saw much more data in the jmx and I was
> > trying to understant it to make the most of them :)
> >
> > But I'll settle knowing that is the useful data. Thank you both!
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 5:05 PM, Jun Rao <jun...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> These are the 0.8 jmx. The 0.7 one can be found in
> >>
> >>
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/Operations#Operations-Monitoring
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >>
> >> Jun
> >>
> >>
> >> On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 6:51 AM, Andrew Otto <o...@wikimedia.org>
> wrote:
> >>
> >> > Here tis!
> >> >
> >> > https://kafka.apache.org/documentation.html#monitoring
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > On Feb 11, 2014, at 6:50 AM, Tomas Nunez <nu...@pythian.com> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > > Hi!
> >> > >
> >> > > Sorry if this question has already been answered, but I've search
> the
> >> > > archives, the project page and the wiki unsuccessfully.
> >> > >
> >> > > I'd like to know the meaning of the jmx exposed metrics. I can guess
> >> > based
> >> > > on the name but I'd like to be sure. Plus, some of them seem to be
> >> reset
> >> > > when I restart the server (or when a new file is created in the
> topic
> >> > > directory, I'm not sure), and some of them don't.
> >> > >
> >> > > Is there a doc anywhere with this info?
> >> > >
> >> > > PD: I'm using 0.7.2 and I know 0.8 changes some things, but I guess
> >> the
> >> > > basic stuff will remain the same...
> >> > >
> >> > > --
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > > --
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> >
> >> >
> >>
> >
> >
>
> --
>
>
> --
>
>
>
>

Reply via email to