Yes I think so - max fetch size defaults to 1 MB and num-replica
fetchers to one which should be sufficient for most people. Setting
those higher would typically lead to higher memory usage when there
are a large number of topics and with num-fetchers it would multiply
the number of socket connections between brokers (although that
shouldn't be a big deal).

Joel

On Wed, Feb 05, 2014 at 03:42:23PM -0800, Jay Kreps wrote:
> Do we have the right default?
> 
> -Jay
> 
> 
> On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 2:04 PM, Joel Koshy <jjkosh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> >
> > > topics are all caught up, but I have one high volume topic (around
> > > 40K msgs/sec) that is taking much longer.  I just took a few samples
> > > of Replica-MaxLag to see how long it would take to catch up.
> > > Currently, it is behind about 12.5 million messages and is catching
> > > up at a rate of about 1600 msgs/sec.  At that rate, it'll take
> > > around 9 days before the replica is caught up to the leader.
> > >
> > > Is there any way to speed this up?
> >
> > During the period your high-volume topic is under-replicated you can
> > temporarily try one or both of the following:
> > - Increasing num.replica.fetchers (defaults is one)
> > - If you don't have too many topic-partitions you can also increase
> >   replica.fetch.max.bytes.
> >
> > > Or, alternatively, I don't actually care about this topic's
> > > history.  It is a new topic, and I know that it doesn't yet have any
> > > consumers.  I'd be fine with instructing both brokers to drop
> > > old logs and just start from the top of the log.  I could do this by
> > > manually deleting the topic (kafka data files and in zookeeper), but
> > > to do so properly with 0.8.0 I think I'd have to shut down the
> > > whole cluster, correct?  I'd rather not do this, as another
> > > topic does have a consumer and I don't want to lose messages for
> > > it.
> >
> > Right - or you could do a rolling bounce and change the retention
> > settings (http://kafka.apache.org/documentation.html#brokerconfigs) of
> > that topic to something low so it gets expired and then do another
> > rolling bounce to remove the override.
> >
> > --
> > Joel
> >

Reply via email to