I am sorry Neha, so late to reply you. I will try that and let you know
anyway.
Thanks Neha,



2013/10/31 Neha Narkhede <neha.narkh...@gmail.com>

> The default replication factor is 1, so even if you have one broker
> failure, you can run into a situation with no leader for some partitions.
> You probably want to use a higher replication factor.
>
> Thanks,
> Neha
>
>
> On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 12:07 PM, Jiang Jacky <jiang0...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi, Neha
> > Thanks for replying, I am currently using the 0.8 version.
> > I did not set any replication factor, it keeps the default from package.
> > When I check the leader for that topic, it is none.
> > It is weird, There is no problem for any other topics except that topic
> > that I am using.
> > For now, I cannot produce the bug, but it is produced in random time, can
> > you tell me what setting shall I set to prevent from this?
> > Thanks
> >
> >
> > 2013/10/29 Neha Narkhede <neha.narkh...@gmail.com>
> >
> > > What is the replication factor and have you checked if there are leader
> > > elections around the time you see the NoAvailableLeader exception? It
> is
> > > important to figure out the root cause of NoAvailableLeader, but it is
> > > transient and should fix itself. Are you using 0.8 HEAD ?
> > >
> > >
> > > On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 5:57 PM, Jiang Jacky <jiang0...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi, Everyone
> > > > For now, I have a kafka cluster, and there is only 1 partition in
> each
> > > > node. i just also produce lots of messages to 1 topic only.
> > > > Then, I have a problem, I used it for a while, the topic is crashed,
> > the
> > > > error message is "NoAvailableLeader", but it is good for other topics
> > > that
> > > > I do not often use. So I have to cleanup the zookeeper cache, and
> > restart
> > > > it again, then that topic comes back normal.
> > > > Can someone tell me how to fix that? I don't want to clean the
> > zookeeper
> > > > sometimes in order to make the topic available. It seems not stable.
> > > > Thanks
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to