Yes, there won't be any feature development in 0.7.

Thanks,

Jun


On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 6:32 PM, Felix GV <fe...@mate1inc.com> wrote:

> Hi guys,
>
> I don't see log.flush.interval being available on per-topic basis in 0.7.2
> either (only the time interval is configurable per topic), as in 0.8.
>
> Is it correct to say that this is only going to be available in 0.8.1 and
> isn't available in 0.7.x?
>
> Thanks a lot guys (: ...
>
> --
> Felix
>
>
> On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 10:27 AM, Jay Kreps <jay.kr...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Both.
> >
> > On Thursday, October 17, 2013, Steve Morin wrote:
> >
> > > Is there only time delay or can it be set to flush for every message
> with
> > > the obvious performance hit?
> > >
> > >
> > > On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 9:49 AM, Jay Kreps <jay.kr...@gmail.com
> > <javascript:;>>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Yes, the change in trunk is that all log configurations are
> > automatically
> > > > available at both the log level and the global default level and can
> be
> > > set
> > > > at topic creation time or changed later without bouncing any servers.
> > > >
> > > > -Jay
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 5:47 PM, Simon Hørup Eskildsen
> > > > <si...@sirupsen.com <javascript:;>>wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Do you mean that it's possible to override log configurations per
> > topic
> > > > in
> > > > > trunk?
> > > > >
> > > > > Yeah, you're right. :-) I wasn't sure what to call it if not
> > > consistency,
> > > > > even though I know that sort of has another meaning in this
> context.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 6:53 PM, Jay Kreps <jay.kr...@gmail.com
> > <javascript:;>>
> > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Yeah, looks like you are right, we don't have the per-topic
> > override
> > > in
> > > > > 0.8
> > > > > > :-(
> > > > > >
> > > > > > All log configurations are overridable in trunk which will be
> > 0.8.1.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Just to be totally clear this setting does not impact consistency
> > > (i.e.
> > > > > all
> > > > > > replicas will have the same messages in the same order), nor even
> > > > > > durability (if you have replication > 1), but just recoverability
> > on
> > > a
> > > > > > single server in the event of a hard machine crash.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > -Jay
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 2:07 PM, Simon Hørup Eskildsen
> > > > > > <si...@sirupsen.com <javascript:;>>wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > 0.8, we're not on master, but we definitely can be.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 5:03 PM, Jay Kreps <
> jay.kr...@gmail.com
> > <javascript:;>
> > > >
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Hey Simon,
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > What version of Kafka are you using?
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > -Jay
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 9:56 AM, Simon Hørup Eskildsen
> > > > > > > > <si...@sirupsen.com <javascript:;>>wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Hi Kafkas!
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Reading through the documentation and code of Kafka, it
> seems
> > > > there
> > > > > > is
> > > > > > > no
> > > > > > > > > feature to set flushing interval (messages/time) for a
> > specific
> > > > > > topic.
> > > > > > > I
> > > > > > > > am
> > > > > > > > > interested in this to get consistency for certain topics by
> > > > > flushing
> > > > > > > > after
> > > > > > > > > every message, while having eventual consistency for other
> > > topics
> > > > > > > > > (default).
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Would there be interest in such feature? Then I might be
> > > curious
> > > > to
> > > > > > > give
> > > > > > > > > the Log module a dive and see if I can foster enough Scala
> to
> > > add
> > > > > > this.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Thanks!
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > Simon
> > > > > > > > > http://sirupsen.com/
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > Simon
> > > > > > > http://sirupsen.com/
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > Simon
> > > > > http://sirupsen.com/
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to