The reason i was asking is that this library seems to have support only for
SimpleConsumer https://github.com/mumrah/kafka-python/, i was curious if
all should be implemented on client or kafka has some rebalancing logic and
prevent consuming from the same queue on server side in case of
SimpleConsumer api, but I see now that everything should implemented on the
client side.

Thanks.


On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 8:52 AM, Guozhang Wang <wangg...@gmail.com> wrote:

> I do not understand your question, what are you trying to implement?
>
>
> On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 8:42 AM, Kane Kane <kane.ist...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > So essentially you can't do "queue" pattern, unless you somehow implement
> > locking on the client?
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 8:35 AM, Guozhang Wang <wangg...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > > SimpleConsumer do not have any concept of group management, only the
> > > high-level consumers have. So multiple simple consumers can
> independently
> > > consume from the same partition(s).
> > >
> > > Guozhang
> > >
> > >
> > > On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 8:11 AM, Kane Kane <kane.ist...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Yeah, I noticed that, i'm curious how balancing happens if
> > SimpleConsumer
> > > > is used. I.e. i can provide a partition to read from if i use
> > > > SimpleConsumer, but what if someone else already attached to that
> > > > partition, what would happen? Also what would happen if one
> > > SimpleConsumer
> > > > attached to all partitions? Noone would be able to join?
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 6:33 AM, Neha Narkhede <
> neha.narkh...@gmail.com
> > > > >wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > There are 2 types of consumer clients in Kafka -
> > > > ZookeeperConsumerConnector
> > > > > and SimpleConsumer. Only the former has the re balancing logic.
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > Neha
> > > > > On Oct 1, 2013 6:30 AM, "Kane Kane" <kane.ist...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > But it looks like some clients don't implement it?
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > -- Guozhang
> > >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> -- Guozhang
>

Reply via email to