>> Can I create multiple connectors, and have each use the same Regex for the TopicFilter? Will each connector share the set of available topics? Is this safe to do?
>> Or is it necessary to create mutually non-intersecting regex's for each connector? As long as each of those consumer connectors share the same group id, Kafka consumer rebalancing should automatically re-distribute the topic/partitions amongst the consumer connectors/streams evenly. Thanks, Neha On Mon, Sep 2, 2013 at 1:35 PM, Jason Rosenberg <j...@squareup.com> wrote: > Will this work if we are using a TopicFilter, that can map to multiple > topics. Can I create multiple connectors, and have each use the same Regex > for the TopicFilter? Will each connector share the set of available > topics? Is this safe to do? > > Or is it necessary to create mutually non-intersecting regex's for each > connector? > > It seems I have a similar issue. I have been using auto commit mode, but > it doesn't guarantee that all messages committed have been successfully > processed (seems a change to the connector itself might expose a way to use > auto offset commit, and have it never commit a message until it is > processed). But that would be a change to the > ZookeeperConsumerConnector....Essentially, it would be great if after > processing each message, we could mark the message as 'processed', and thus > use that status as the max offset to commit when the auto offset commit > background thread wakes up each time. > > Jason > > > On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 11:58 AM, Yu, Libo <libo...@citi.com> wrote: > > > Thanks, Neha. That is a great answer. > > > > Regards, > > > > Libo > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Neha Narkhede [mailto:neha.narkh...@gmail.com] > > Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2013 1:55 PM > > To: users@kafka.apache.org > > Subject: Re: is it possible to commit offsets on a per stream basis? > > > > 1 We can create multiple connectors. From each connector create only one > > stream. > > 2 Use a single thread for a stream. In this case, the connector in each > > thread can commit freely without any dependence on the other threads. Is > > this the right way to go? Will it introduce any dead lock when multiple > > connectors commit at the same time? > > > > This is a better approach as there is no complex locking involved. > > > > Thanks, > > Neha > > > > > > On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 10:28 AM, Yu, Libo <libo...@citi.com> wrote: > > > > > Hi team, > > > > > > This is our current use case: > > > Assume there is a topic with multiple partitions. > > > 1 Create a connector first and create multiple streams from the > > > connector for a topic. > > > 2 Create multiple threads, one for each stream. You can assume the > > > thread's job is to save the message into the database. > > > 3 When it is time to commit offsets, all threads have to synchronize > > > on a barrier before committing the offsets. This is to ensure no > > > message loss in case of process crash. > > > > > > As all threads need to synchronize before committing, it is not > > efficient. > > > This is a workaround: > > > > > > 1 We can create multiple connectors. From each connector create only > > > one stream. > > > 2 Use a single thread for a stream. In this case, the connector in > > > each thread can commit freely without any dependence on the other > > > threads. Is this the right way to go? Will it introduce any dead lock > > > when multiple connectors commit at the same time? > > > > > > It would be great to allow committing on a per stream basis. > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > Libo > > > > > > > > >
