Can you explain why not? On Aug 29, 2013, at 8:43 AM, Benjamin Black <b...@b3k.us> wrote:
> The LB in front of the brokers doesn't make sense. > On Aug 29, 2013 8:42 AM, "Mark" <static.void....@gmail.com> wrote: > >> We have a few dozen front-end web apps running rails. Each one of these >> rails instances has an embedded producer which in turn connects to a 3 >> brokers who are behind a load-balancer. Does that sound about right? >> >> Is there anything special to account for since these TCP connections are >> long lived? >> >> On Aug 29, 2013, at 7:20 AM, Jun Rao <jun...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> I think a typical setup is that you have a load balancer in front of a >>> bunch of frontend services, each of which has an embedded producer. >>> >>> Thanks, >>> >>> Jun >>> >>> >>> On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 9:01 PM, Mark <static.void....@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> Is it common/necessary to load balance the connections your producers >> use? >>>> I'm looking at the Ruby gem and it doesn't look like this is handled via >>>> the gem. >> >>
