We've been using 3.4.5 as the server since many months and have never seen any issues.
On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 3:25 PM, Felix GV <fe...@mate1inc.com> wrote: > We've upgraded our ZK installation to 3.4.5 (by using the apt package from > CDH) about a month ago and have been running it since without much issue. > > In our case, the only problem is that our previous installation of ZK had > unlimited client connections (maxClientCnxns=0) and the vanilla CDH > installation defaulted this setting to 50, so we hit connection limits in > our particular environment. We raised that config value higher and have > been running smoothly since. > > As for the snapshot retention, we chose not to use ZK 3.4.x's built-in > clean up capabilities because the cron job we already had was more flexible > (with different retention times for snapshots and transaction logs). > > Cheers :) ! > > -- > Felix > > > On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 9:37 PM, Matt Christiansen <ad...@nikore.net> > wrote: > > > I have been using ZK 3.4.5 in production for about 6 months now with out > > any issues, Kafka, HBase, HDFS HA, our own apps all seem to work fine > with > > it. It also has some nice operational upgrades including auto expiring of > > the log and snapshots. > > > > > > On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 8:56 AM, Jun Rao <jun...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > We do plan to look into upgrading to ZK 3.4.5 at some point, especially > > for > > > picking up the multi() feature. ZK 3.4.5 should be backward compatible. > > Do > > > you know how stable it is? > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > Jun > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 9:36 PM, Ran RanUser <ranuse...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > > > > > I'm running Zookeeper 3.4.5 server and using 3.4.5 clients in other > > code. > > > > > > > > Will Kafka switch to Zookeeper 3.4.5 soon? > > > > > > > > Should I expect any potential issues if Kafka's Zookeeper client is > > 3.3.4 > > > > while our server is 3.4.5? > > > > > > > > Thanks! > > > > > > > > > > -- Regards, Premal Shah.
