Hi Francis/Stone,

I have modified log.default.flush.interval.ms to have a value of 1 in
config/server.properties file. The time did not come down as can be seen
from the following output:

Message received at 2013-05-17 11:54:02.973: Message produced at 2013-05-17
11:54:01.444: Message_1
Message received at 2013-05-17 11:54:02.974: Message produced at 2013-05-17
11:54:01.536: Message_2
Message received at 2013-05-17 11:54:02.974: Message produced at 2013-05-17
11:54:01.537: Message_3
and so on...

Regards,
Kishore

On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 11:49 AM, Francis Dallaire <
francis.dalla...@ubisoft.com> wrote:

> +1 ... very good suggestion.
>
>
> Sent from Samsung Mobile
>
>
>
> -------- Original message --------
> From: Stone <stones....@gmail.com>
> Date: 05-17-2013 2:16 AM (GMT-05:00)
> To: users@kafka.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Kafka performance
>
>
> Hi Kishore,
>
> Since a message is only exposed to the consumers after it is flushed. Maybe
> you can try lower log.default.flush.interval.ms which controls the maximum
> time that a message in any topic is kept in memory before flushed to disk (
> by default it's 3000ms )
>
> ref - http://kafka.apache.org/07/configuration.html
>
> Best Regards,
> Stone
>
>
> On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 12:46 PM, Kishore Kopalle <kkopa...@gmail.com
> >wrote:
>
> > Hello All,
> >
> > I am evaluating Kafka for use in a real time financial product. I am
> tying
> > to calculate the time it takes for a message to be fetched by the
> consumer
> > after it has been sent by a producer. I am finding that this takes a long
> > time of between 900-1200 ms per message on Windows 7 single core
> processor.
> > Is this the expected result? This seems to be very slow. All my configs
> are
> > default except for the following properties being put:
> >    props.put("zk.sessiontimeout.ms", "400");
> >     props.put("zk.synctime.ms", "200");
> >     props.put("autocommit.interval.ms", "1000");
> >
> > Am I missing any configuration steps for server/producer/consumer?
> >
> > Thanks in advance for answering,
> > Kishore
> >
>

Reply via email to