thanks Jun On Feb 21, 2013, at 11:26 PM, Jun Rao <jun...@gmail.com> wrote:
> The remaining 0.8 blockers are tracked in > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/Kafka+replication+development > > Thanks, > > Jun > > On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 9:14 PM, graham sanderson <gra...@vast.com> wrote: > >> Thanks, so if I understand what you are saying is that 0.8 is alpha-ish; >> i.e. everything pretty much implemented (is there anything major missing - >> hard to tell looking at JIRA without much context) - we use at our own risk >> (which we're fine with), but that given we really want 0.8 features we can >> and should start testing with it today, with an expectation of a release in >> the next N months where N is hopefully no more than 2 >> >> On Feb 21, 2013, at 11:06 PM, Neha Narkhede <neha.narkh...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >>> 0.8 is a significant rewrite since the 0.7 codebase. Hence, there is no >>> easy way to "turn off" replication and expect 0.7.2 like functionality. >>> Having said that, it is somewhat stable so you can use it for >> prototyping. >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Neha >>> >>> >>> On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 1:42 PM, graham sanderson <gra...@vast.com> >> wrote: >>> >>>> So I am excited that 0.8 is getting close. >>>> >>>> I understand that 0.8 is pre-beta, but to what extent would you say the >>>> bugs are mostly with the new redundancy code vs regressions in existing >>>> functionality; i.e. if wanting to prototype and deploy something over >> the >>>> next month or so with the view to deploying it within the next two >> months, >>>> is it safe-ish to go with 0.8 with replicated brokers turned off (for >> now) >>>> vs going with 0.7.2? >>>> >>>> Also does anyone know the status of any node.js clients for 0.8 >>>> >>>> On Feb 21, 2013, at 3:32 PM, David Arthur <mum...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> I've been having trouble building trunk since the changes to sbt in >> 0.8. >>>> Is there some documentation on building and running trunk? >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On 2/21/13 3:53 PM, Neha Narkhede wrote: >>>>>> HEAD is good as of today and has been stable for past few days. There >>>> are >>>>>> some bugs we are working on but you can certainly run the cluster and >> do >>>>>> some basic send/receive operations. Also, let us know if you have >>>> feedback >>>>>> on the APIs, protocols, tools etc since that takes some time to >> refactor >>>>>> and change. >>>>>> >>>>>> Good luck! :-) >>>>>> >>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>> Neha >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 12:51 PM, Jason Rosenberg <j...@squareup.com> >>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Thanks Neha, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> That's helpful info. Is there a reasonable checkpoint rev to check >>>> out now >>>>>>> and experiment with, or is HEAD as good as anything else? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Jason >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 3:31 PM, Neha Narkhede < >>>> neha.narkh...@gmail.com >>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>> Hi Jason, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> We are closely monitoring the health of one of our production >> clusters >>>>>>> that >>>>>>>> has the 0.8 code deployed. This cluster is feeding off of LinkedIn's >>>>>>>> production traffic. Once this cluster is fairly stable, we'd like to >>>> run >>>>>>>> all of our tools and ensure those are working. Another thing we are >>>>>>> trying >>>>>>>> is to introduce failures on this cluster when it is under load and >>>> ensure >>>>>>>> that there is no data loss. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> So far, we've been working on stabilizing this cluster and fixing >>>> bugs. >>>>>>>> Next week, we will be working on tools and setting up audit so we >> can >>>> do >>>>>>>> some data loss analysis, if any. This will probably take another >>>> month. >>>>>>>> After that, I think we should be ready to release a public BETA and >>>> have >>>>>>>> our users try it. If we release it sooner than that, I'm not sure it >>>> will >>>>>>>> be helpful since tools and simple failure cases might not work as >>>>>>> expected. >>>>>>>> As far as formal release goes, I believe end of March or April will >>>> be a >>>>>>>> good timeframe. We will try our best to update documentation for the >>>> BETA >>>>>>>> release, 3-4 weeks from now. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>>>> Neha >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 9:44 AM, Jason Rosenberg <j...@squareup.com> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>> Just wanted to inquire as to the status 0.8 being released to beta. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I have several use cases now that would like to take advantage of >> the >>>>>>> new >>>>>>>>> features in 0.8, and I'm not sure if it makes sense to keep waiting >>>> for >>>>>>>> an >>>>>>>>> actual release, before attempting to use the latest HEAD version in >>>>>>>>> staging/production environments. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> How stable is the 0.8 branch at this point? What is the schedule >>>> for a >>>>>>>>> formal release? When will there at least be a link to 0.8 >>>>>>> documentation, >>>>>>>>> where to download it, on the main apache kafka site? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Jason >>>>>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> >> >>
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
