Of course you are right. I considered the client would be the issue and do not now remember why I discounted it. Thank you.
On 14 April 2015 at 17:00, Eric Covener <cove...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 6:49 AM, Mike Peachey <mike.peac...@port.im> > wrote: > > This client is getting responses from httpd on ports 63156+ > > The server side of the connection uses a well-known listening port, > 443. Clients use those high ephemeral ports. I don't think tuning an > ephemeral port range on the server does anything unless you use > mod_proxy for outbound connections. > > > > -- > Eric Covener > cove...@gmail.com > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@httpd.apache.org > > -- Mike Peachey mike.peac...@port.im
