Hi,
From the 501 Not implemented and from some of your telnet sessions
copies, I see you use also "get / http/1.1" but beware, HTTP is case
sensitive, and you should use "GET / HTTP/1.1". This would explain why
wget gets your resource correctly but you can't get it through telnet.
Hope this help!
Zimmi
Le 04.01.2015 03:35, ghalvor...@hushmail.com a écrit :
On January 3, 2015 at 9:09 PM, "Stormy" <storm...@stormy.ca> wrote:
At 08:40 PM 1/3/2015 -0500, ghalvor...@hushmail.com wrote:
[snip]
I'm not sure why these two behave differently (www.example.com vs
example.com) I always thought the extra four letters were
something that
Apache knew how to deal with. It's hard to guarantee that the
user will
user type or omit the 'www.' What should be done about this?
ServerAlias ?
It was undefined. I thought I would implement it according to online
documentation. I retyped an equivalent excerpt from my sites-available
directory.
ServerName www.example.com
ServerAlias example.com
DocumentRoot /var/www/example.com/ht-docs/
When I perform the telnet 80 test, I get a "501 Not Implemented", but the wget
command pulls the index.html correctly. I never trust a web browser when diagnosing a
web page because they like to cache web files. I used telnet to simulate a web browser
request, as explained in a blog, but it is apparently wrong...
This is the offending article I used, by the way.
http://www.the-art-of-web.com/system/telnet-http11/
Best -- Paul
-------------------------------------------------------------------
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@httpd.apache.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@httpd.apache.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@httpd.apache.org
