On Tue, 17 Jul 2012 23:25:09 +0300 Nadav Har'El <n...@math.technion.ac.il> wrote:
> The resulting code is ugly, hairy and Unix-only, but it works and > performance is significantly better than normal mod_cgi for my usecase > of very large program-generated files. For example, a simple CGI > generating 512 MB of data took 0.9 seconds to fetch locally when using > mod_cgi, but only 0.4 seconds with my "zero-copy mod_cgi". > > Additionally, after this local fetch with my "zero-copy mod_cgi", the > httpd process remains tiny (2 MB resident), while with the original > "pass through the do-nothing bucket brigade" mod_cgi, httpd grew to > 86 MB resident. Did you test your program with mod_cgid, mod_fcgid, mod_proxy_scgi? I'm thinking, if they also grow out-of-control with your program then it would probably be worth fixing. -- Nick Kew --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@httpd.apache.org
