2010/10/8 Igor Galić <i.ga...@brainsware.org>: > ----- Tom Evans <tevans...@googlemail.com> wrote: >> If you did not also add a NameVirtualHost for *:80, then that is to be >> expected. If you don't do any IP/port based virtual hosting, then it >> is usually easiest to do: >> >> NameVirtualHost * >> >> <VirtualHost *> > > that's ambigous. a better practice is to use *:80 (when Listen-ing on port 80) >
(I call FUD) What is ambiguous about it? Is it open to more than one interpretation? What is better about using *:80, in your opinion (since you seem to have one about it)? It's two less characters to type, and means that however I configure the Listen directives, or how I connect to the server, my list of configured vhosts is applied correctly. Tom --------------------------------------------------------------------- The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See <URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org " from the digest: users-digest-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@httpd.apache.org
