Each virtual host must have the url that reaches that host within a
ServerName directive as below
NameVirtualHost *:80
<VirtualHost *:80>
ServerName URL1
</VirtualHost>
<VirtualHost *:80>
ServerName URL2
</VirtualHost>
On Sun, Jun 6, 2010 at 7:04 PM, Jeff Shearer <[email protected]>wrote:
> Thanks that's great news.
>
> I am still trying to resolve this error message I am getting. Eric said I
> need to be certain that my NameVirtualHost and VirtualHost directives
> matched literally. I reread the documentation on http://httpd.apache.organd
> see what I believe is the same statement said differently. That the
> directives must match. I checked each of the directives on my development
> server and they match. Here are the greps:
>
> NameVirtualHost 192.168.0.93:80 <http://192.168.0.93/>
> <VirtualHost 192.168.0.93:80 <http://192.168.0.93/>>
> <VirtualHost 192.168.0.93:80 <http://192.168.0.93/>>
> <VirtualHost 192.168.0.93:80 <http://192.168.0.93/>>
> <VirtualHost 192.168.0.93:80 <http://192.168.0.93/>>
> <VirtualHost 192.168.0.93:80 <http://192.168.0.93/>>
>
> I also carefully verified that my /etc/hosts include a fqdn for each of the
> VirtualHosts served from my development server. Yet, I get the following
> error:
>
> [Sun Jun 06 14:02:11 2010] [warn] NameVirtualHost
> 192.168.0.93:80<http://192.168.0.93/>has no VirtualHosts
>
> I am going nuts here with this. What am I missing?
>
> Thanks.
>
>
> ======================
> Jeff Shearer, CISA, CISSP
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: "Manoj Samtani" [[email protected]]
> Date: 06/06/2010 10:43 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: RE: [us...@httpd] NameVirtualHost Directive - - - - Multiple SSL
> virtual hosts
>
> Look this link dear,
>
>
> http://www.zdnetasia.com/configure-apache-to-support-multiple-ssl-sites-on-a-single-ip-address-62059501.htm
>
>
> In web hosting environment, one certificate used for single domain and
> other sites are using by /sitename etc.. but if we use Apache 2.2.12 version
> we can install multiple Certificates for multiple Domains.
>
>
> Regards,
> Manoj
>
> > Date: Sun, 6 Jun 2010 13:29:26 -0400
> > CC:
> > To: [email protected]
> > From: [email protected]
> > Subject: RE: [us...@httpd] NameVirtualHost Directive - - - - Multiple
> SSL virtual hosts
> >
> > Manoj,
> >
> > I am using 2.2.11. Hmmmmm.
> >
> > Are you saying if I move to 2.2.12 I can server multiple name-based ssl
> virtual hosts on the same IP and ports?
> >
> > Even so, I may choose to use a multi-domain SSL certificate. Being able
> to use this for up to 25 domains seems like a lower cost alternative to
> buying 25 separate certificates.. Have you had any experience with this?
> If so, do you know how to configure the virtual hosts for this? I am
> guessing one just points the SSL directives in each VirutalHost to the same
> server key and certificate. But please, advise if you know for certain how
> this works.
> >
> > Thanks.
> >
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: "Manoj Samtani" [[email protected]]
> > Date: 06/06/2010 10:20 AM
> > To: [email protected]
> > Subject: RE: [us...@httpd] NameVirtualHost Directive - - - - Multiple
> SSL
> > virtual hosts
> >
> > Which Apache version are you using?
> >
> > Till now Multiple SSL VHOST's are not available for same port and IP.
> This can be possible through Apache 2.2.12.
> > So, you do not need to take tension ;-)
> >
> >
> > Just change your Apache Version.
> >
> >
> > Regards,
> > Manoj
> >
> > > Date: Sat, 5 Jun 2010 16:12:09 -0400
> > > From: [email protected]
> > > To: [email protected]
> > > Subject: Re: [us...@httpd] NameVirtualHost Directive - - - - Multiple
> SSL virtual hosts
> > >
> > > On Sat, Jun 5, 2010 at 4:08 PM, Jeff Shearer <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> > > > [Sat Jun 05 15:51:21 2010] [warn] VirtualHost
> > > > fqdn1.com:80<http://fqdn1.com/>overlaps with VirtualHost
> fqdn2.com:80 <http://fqdn2.com/>, the first has precedence, perhaps you
> need a NameVirtualHost directive
> > > >
> > > > This is repeated for every name-based virtual host I have until I
> added the fqdns to /etc/hosts. However, I still get the error message about
> NameVirtualHost 192.168.0.93 has no Virtual Hosts
> > > >
> > >
> > > The arguments for your 1 NameVirtualHost and correspoinding N
> > > VirtualHosts have to be identical in the literal sense, not just
> > > logically the same.
> > > --
> > > Eric Covener
> > > [email protected]
> > >
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server
> Project.
> > > See <URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info.
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> > > " from the digest: [email protected]
> > > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
> > >
> >
> >
> > Manage your finance and manage money through MSN Money Special Drag n'
> drop
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server
> Project.
> > See <URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info.
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> > " from the digest: [email protected]
> > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
> >
>
>
> The dark side of terrorists revealed in MSN Internal Security Get it now.
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project.
> See <URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info.
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> " from the digest: [email protected]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>
>
