On 15-Jan-2010, at 10:34, Jarrod Slick wrote:
>>> So, I should be more specific with my question: to the end of determining
>>> strictly which webserver is more efficient do you see any problems with
>>> this type of setup?
>>
>> More 'efficient' I think you mean.
>
> Is that not exactly what I said?
My quotes were meant to indicate that the 'efficient' you are testing really
has nothing to do with actual efficiency.
>>> And another question: how would you do it differently? Sure, in an ideal
>>> world I could assemble my own botnet and then blast my corporate network
>>> with a gigabit of distributed traffic multiple times for each webserver --
>>> but obviously in the real world that's not going to happen.
>>
>> The question you have to ask yourself is what are you wanting to test? A
>> completely artificial metric with no real-world correlation? If so, then
>> you're on the right track.
>
> Instead of dancing around the issue can you please provide some suggestions?
I did provide suggestions, you said they weren't possible.
> Or do you just like to be contrary?
That too.
--
Well, if crime fighters fight crime and fire fighters fight fire,
what do freedom fighters fight? They never mention that part to
us, do they?
---------------------------------------------------------------------
The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project.
See <URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org
" from the digest: users-digest-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@httpd.apache.org
