On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 1:02 PM, Chris Copeland <[email protected]> wrote: > Jeff, thanks for the help. Replacing that file solved my problem. > > I could use some guidance on what to do now. I am building packages > for use on production servers. > > * Would 2.2.14 with this patch suitable for use on a production server?
yes > * Would an earlier version of 2.2 be better for my Solaris 10 x86 > environment? possibly; you'd have to pick your poison though; httpd 2.2.11 and the APR that came with it should be okay with the prefork MPM as far as the port code goes, but there are a number of bugs fixed since then; I can't really recommend that > * Should I wait for a release that includes these changes? no > > Any advice greatly appreciated. > > -Chris > > On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 6:47 PM, Jeff Trawick <[email protected]> wrote: >> Are you using the APR bundled with httpd? If so, please replace >> srclib/apr/pool/unix/port.c with the latest version: >> >> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/apr/apr/branches/1.3.x/poll/unix/port.c?revision=836111&view=co >> >> I don't recognize the backtrace you posted, but that logic is in the >> general vicinity of two important fixes. One is specific to 32-bit >> builds on Solaris 10 x86; the other is necessary for all Solaris 10 or >> OpenSolaris. >> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. > See <URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info. > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > " from the digest: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > -- Born in Roswell... married an alien... --------------------------------------------------------------------- The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See <URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] " from the digest: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
