Phone
----- Original Message ----- From: nicholas....@sun.com <nicholas....@sun.com> To: users@httpd.apache.org <users@httpd.apache.org> Sent: Fri Nov 20 08:58:16 2009 Subject: Re: [us...@httpd] crash in Apache core with mod_proxy_fcgi in 2.2 and trunk Edgar Frank wrote: > Hi Nick, > > thanks for you instant reply. > >> mod_proxy_fcgi is not really ready for primetime. You should only >> use it if you're expecting to hack/debug it, and preferably feed back >> your experiences/fixes. > That's good to know. I saw mod_proxy_fcgi being relatively old. When it > was added into the SVN trunk it looked much like a copy of the formerly > existing mod_proxy_fcgi. So I expected it to be kinda stable. Hmmm. I may have been wrong; it's just my impression that mod_proxy_fcgi had essentially been abandoned. > What would be then the right place/person to report feedback to? d...@httpd and/or bugzilla. But that depends on someone who's actually worked on it being motivated to respond, and mod_fcgid reduces the likelihood of that happening. >> As it stands, there's no great likelihood of that happening unless >> someone makes it happen. Since mod_fcgid has been donated >> to apache, that's now the focus of fastcgi work among the devs. >> >> My best suggestions: >> (1) Enter a report in bugzilla >> (2) If you really want proxy_fcgi and not mod_fcgid, tell us what >> you need that the one offers but the other doesn't. > > For (2), what would be again the right place to report? d...@httpd. > The prime reason for me to use mod_proxy_fcgi is that mod_fcgid doesn't > offer a possibility to specify an externally spawned FCGI process on > a remote host. The other reason is that I need the env-var interpolation > respectivly mod_rewrite-capabilities to change the target FCGI server > depening on request data (e.g. forward a well-known user to his "home" > server). > mod_proxy_fcgi is perfect for me, because it's small, doesn't come with > a process manager and allows dynamic configuration of the target server. Now that makes sense - and indeed ties into something I'm trying to work towards (but don't expect anything exciting anytime soon). Posting something based on that to dev@ might be more productive than a long/rambling report that you have to read in detail before confirming it looks like a bug (as opposed to a user error). > If I missed that features in mod_fcgid, I'd be glad if you could let me > know. > > There is still mod_fastcgi on my mind, but I'd have to modify it to > work for my purpose and it's code is horrible in terms that it still > has support for Apache 1.x. If mod_fastcgi has capabilities that are missing in mod_fcgid and that you have a use for, that may be worth turning into a feature request. -- Nick Kew --------------------------------------------------------------------- The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See <URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org " from the digest: users-digest-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@httpd.apache.org TRAVEL BUG EFFECT: Craving for a Challenge Man V. Food, Wednesdays at 10PM E/P CATCH IT | travelchannel.com
