Bob Ionescu escribió:
> 2009/5/12 Roman Medina-Heigl Hernandez <ro...@rs-labs.com>:
>> My final solution is:
>>
>> RewriteBase /stats
>> RewriteCond %{REMOTE_USER}/<>$1 !^([^<]+)<>\1
>> RewriteRule ^/clientes/(.*)
>> /stats/%{REMOTE_USER}/stats/http/$1
>>
>> RewriteCond $1 !^[^/]+/stats/http/
>> RewriteRule ^/clientes/(.*) hacking_attempt [F]
>>
>>
>> The alternative (adding L) is:
>>
>> RewriteBase /stats
>> RewriteCond %{REMOTE_USER}/<>$1 !^([^<]+)<>\1
>> RewriteRule ^/clientes/(.*)
>> /stats/%{REMOTE_USER}/stats/http/$1 [L]
>>
>> RewriteCond $1 !^[^/]+/stats/http/
>> RewriteRule ^/clientes/(.*) hacking_attempt [F,L]
>>
>> But I see no real difference between both solutions. Am I right?
>
> L makes only sense to abort something below, i.e. if there's nothing,
> there's nothing to abort (F implies L btw., the substitution will be
> dropped as well). Your second rule (forbidden) comes never true, if
> the first rule matched. So you could stop further (useless) processing
> with the L flag at your first rule.
Agreed.
For the record, final solution:
RewriteBase /stats
RewriteCond %{REMOTE_USER}/<>$1 !^([^<]+)<>\1
RewriteRule ^/clientes/(.*)
/stats/%{REMOTE_USER}/stats/http/$1 [L]
RewriteCond $1 !^[^/]+/stats/http/
RewriteRule ^/clientes/(.*) hacking_attempt [F]
Thanks a lot to all who contributed the thread and specially to Bob!!!!
Cheers,
-Roman
---------------------------------------------------------------------
The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project.
See <URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org
" from the digest: users-digest-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@httpd.apache.org
