Thanks Tony,

will work on the suggestion and will let you know..

Kulbir

On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 5:58 PM, Anthony J. Biacco <
abia...@formatdynamics.com> wrote:

>  Your math is still off. ServerLimit x ThreadsPerChild  = 200 x 25 = 5000.
> This does not equal your MaxClients of 1000. Try a ServerLimit of 20 and
> ThreadsPerChild of 50.
>
>
>
> If you’re vmstat “r” column is high, chances are you’re getting a lot of
> requests. What’s your apache requests/second? (check the apache
> server-status webpage). That will also tell you what the incoming
> connections are actually doing. Maybe you have EnableSendFile on and your
> system doesn’t support it. Maybe you have EnableMMAP on and your system
> doesn’t support it. Maybe you’re pulling files over NFS over a slow link?
>
> Until you look at the server-status page, you won’t know.
>
> You should also run an strace on your apache processes to find out some
> more information, see if there’s a lot of extraneous calls or error in
> there.
>
> strace -f -F -v –p <an_apache_child_pid>
>
>
>
> And you should still see what all these numbers look like with keepalives
> off.
>
>
>
> -Tony
>
> ---------------------------
>
> Manager, IT Operations
>
> Format Dynamics, Inc.
>
> 303-573-1800x27
>
> abia...@formatdynamics.com
>
> http://www.formatdynamics.com
>
>
>
> *From:* kulbir Saini [mailto:kulbir.sai...@gmail.com]
> *Sent:* Friday, March 13, 2009 9:08 PM
>
> *To:* users@httpd.apache.org
> *Subject:* Re: [us...@httpd] Apache Tunning
>
>
>
> Hi All
>
> Thanks.
>
> I also agree lowering MaxRequestsPerChild will keep busy apache in killing
> and recreating child process. I dont know what Math i worked, i reconfigured
> both of the  apache  instances on the server with following -
>
> <IfModule worker.c>
> ServerLimit         200
> StartServers         2
> MaxClients         1000
> MinSpareThreads     75
> MaxSpareThreads    250
> ThreadsPerChild     25
> MaxRequestsPerChild  20000
> </IfModule>
>
> KeepAliveTimeout 5
>
> There was rise in load, teh system snapshot is -
>
> [r...@cinschpr35 root]# top
>   5:46pm  up 257 days,  7:09,  5 users,  load average: 5.70, 5.31, 5.15
> 614 processes: 606 sleeping, 8 running, 0 zombie, 0 stopped
> CPU0 states: 98.2% user,  1.1% system,  0.0% nice,  0.1% idle
> CPU1 states: 99.4% user,  0.0% system,  0.0% nice,  0.1% idle
> CPU2 states: 99.4% user,  0.1% system,  0.0% nice,  0.0% idle
> CPU3 states: 98.4% user,  1.0% system,  0.0% nice,  0.0% idle
> Mem:  3927672K av, 3922000K used,    5672K free,    5196K shrd, 1363088K
> buff
> Swap: 1048536K av,     736K used, 1047800K free                 2112964K
> cached
>
>   PID      USER     PRI  NI  SIZE  RSS SHARE  STAT %CPU %MEM   TIME
> COMMAND
> 32006  apache0   25   0   6796 6796  4092       R    99.8         0.1
> 213:21    httpd
>  2306   apache0   25   0  6624 6624  4100       R    99.4
> 0.1        136:42    httpd
>  2298 apache0   25   0  6624 6624  4100         R    97.2
> 0.1         135:39     httpd
>  2308 apache0   25   0  6624 6624  4100          R    95.4
> 0.1       135:05     httpd
> 17059 tomcat1   15   0 82432  80M  9932        S     1.1           2.0
>   9:10         java
> 14678 tomcat0   15   0  101M 101M 31464      S     1.1          2.6
> 6:32       java
> 16228 root      15   0  1488 1488   836              R     1.1
> 0.0        0:00      top
> 19850 tomcat1   15   0 82432  80M  9932       S     0.9           2.0
>    6:16    java
>  1110 tomcat0   15   0  101M 101M 31464       S     0.5
> 2.6          10:19    java
> 23605 tomcat0   15   0  101M 101M 31464      S     0.5           2.6
>    7:31     java
>
> #free -m
>              total       used       free     shared    buffers     cached
> Mem:          3835       3828          7          5       1335       2059
> -/+ buffers/cache:        433       3402
> Swap:         1023          0       1023
>
>
>   procs                      memory                      swap
> io     system         cpu
>  r  b  w   swpd   free      buff         cache      si  so    bi    bo
> in    cs  us  sy  id
>  5  0  1    736   8236 1367124 2108452   0   0     1    12    3     1  11
> 5  13
>  4  0  0    736   8156 1367132 2108460   0   0     0   172  370   404  98
> 2   0
>  4  0  1    736   8172 1367132 2108468   0   0     0     0  281   309  99
> 1   0
>  4  0  1    736   8168 1367132 2108480   0   0     0   162  288   366 100
> 0   0
>  5  0  1    736   8128 1367132 2108488   0   0     0     0  287   342  99
> 1   0
>  4  0  1    736   8136 1367132 2108496   0   0     0   148  286   322 100
> 1   0
>  5  0  1    736   8180 1367132 2108504   0   0     0     0  275   332  98
> 2   0
>  4  0  2    736   8148 1367132 2108512   0   0     0    10  267   326  99
> 1   0
>  4  0  1    736   8184 1367136 2108520   0   0     0   190  288   357  99
> 1   0
>  4  0  0    736   8104 1367136 2108536   0   0     0    10  298   404  99
> 1   0
>  4  0  2    736   7980 1367140 2108540   0   0     0   254  332   414  99
> 1   0
>  4  0  0    736   7968 1367140 2108548   0   0     0    20  286   408  98
> 2   0
>  5  0  1    736   7972 1367140 2108560   0   0     0     0  346   418  99
> 1   0
>  4  0  1    736   7992 1367144 2108568   0   0     0   216  315   371 100
> 0   0
>  5  0  0    736   8004 1367144 2108576   0   0     0     0  285   358 100
> 0   0
>  5  0  0    736   7956 1367144 2108588   0   0     0   158  333   392 100
> 0   0
>  6  0  2    736   7928 1367144 2108596   0   0     0     0  326   383  99
> 1   0
>  6  0  2    736   8064 1367144 2108604   0   0     0     0  291   356 100
> 0   0
>  4  0  0    736   8056 1367148 2108616   0   0     0   180  301   376  99
> 1   0
>  4  0  1    736   8016 1367148 2108624   0   0     0    34  335   413  99
> 1   0
>
>
> Above, i can see two things happened-
>
> 1> in "top" output teh httpd process eating CPU has high "TIME" value. why?
> 2> the vmstat output value of "r" increases. Why?
>
> Thanks in advance
>
>
> Kulbir
>
>
>  On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 6:38 PM, Tadeu Alves <tadeu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> i forget the other stuff i'm using moodle with some images werving with
> eaccelerator running with php and i you want i can send a conf file about
> mysql, php and apache if you would like to.
>
> On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 2:45 PM, Anthony J. Biacco <
> abia...@formatdynamics.com> wrote:
>
>  1. I have to rail totally against this. The more you lower
> MaxRequestsPerChild, the more often apache is killing and recreating a child
> process. At numbers as low as 2000 or lower, you’re starting to defeat the
> whole purpose of using the worker mpm.
>
> >=50% of apache’s time is going to be spent managing child processes on a
> high traffic site. MaxRequestsPerChild should either be 0 or something very
> high. IF your process memory usage gets higher and higher, then you have a
> memory leak somewhere.
>
> 2. Don’t use ThreadLimit, stick with ThreadsPerChild
>
> 3. You MaxClients doesn’t sync up to your other numbers. MaxClients is
> going to be ServerLimit x ThreadsPerChild. So for you, 1500. If you want to
> serve 1500 concurrent reqs, then set MaxClients to match this at 1500. If
> you want 500, then change ServerLimit,StartServers and ThreadsPerChild so
> the math is right. For instance, ServerLimit 10, StartServers 5,
> ThreadsPerChild 50 will be you a MaxClients of 500.
>
> If you give us your server parameters (cpu, memory, modules loaded, apache
> rss usage, types of files served), we’d be able to better recommend numbers
> for what your server can support.
>
>
>
> -Tony
>
> ---------------------------
>
> Manager, IT Operations
>
> Format Dynamics, Inc.
>
> 303-573-1800x27
>
> abia...@formatdynamics.com
>
> http://www.formatdynamics.com
>
>
>
> *From:* Tadeu Alves [mailto:tadeu...@gmail.com]
> *Sent:* Friday, March 13, 2009 8:45 AM
> *To:* users@httpd.apache.org
> *Subject:* Re: [us...@httpd] Apache Tunning
>
>
>
> nice one. Getting on this hook, in my server we run moodle i dunno if you
> guys know about it and a very high hits/second i wan't to know if going down
> about MaxRequestsPerChild 500 will be good to performance and any idea about
> changing my server variables to make it support more concurrent connections
>
>
>
> ########################################
>
> <IfModule worker.c>
> ServerLimit          30
> ThreadLimit          70
> StartServers           20
> MaxClients            500
> MinSpareThreads        10
> MaxSpareThreads        15
> ThreadsPerChild        50
> MaxRequestsPerChild  2000
> MaxMemFree          5000
> #ReceiveBufferSize  714400 (not using anymore)
>
>
>
> #################################
>
>
>
>
>
> On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 5:41 AM, Gaurav Khambhala <gau...@deeproot.co.in>
> wrote:
>
> Hi Kulbir,
>
>
>
> Gaurav wrote:
>
> Tadeu Alves wrote:
>
> i thibk that you can down the variable
>  MaxRequestsPerChild  20000 to 2000 it's too much and if the child process
> keeps the request well i't grows bigger and bigger in memory
>
>
> Even 2000 is too much. Various high load,high traffic servers also don't
> have this much high value.
>
>
>
> Found this: http://rimuhosting.com/howto/memory.jsp may be useful to you.
>
>
>
>
> --
> Cheers,
>
>
> Gaurav Khambhala
> i-hack-at-DeepRoot Linux
> Getting GNU/Linux to work for you. Faster. Better. Today. Every way.
> http://www.deeproot.in, +91 80 4089 0000
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project.
> See <URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info.
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org
>  "   from the digest: users-digest-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@httpd.apache.org
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

Reply via email to