Thanks Bill,
I posted your caveat too on http://www.apachelounge.com
Steffen
----- Original Message -----
From: "William A. Rowe, Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <users@httpd.apache.org>
Sent: Sunday, 23 September, 2007 09:57
Subject: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Binaries prepared for users@ win32 testing
Sander Temme wrote:
I have not tried mod_perl. So far, I have only tried the default path
through the installer, not more and not less than I describe.
Thanks Sander! Since I had validated 1.3/2.0 several times and 2.2 once
in it's final iteration, I'll trust your double check of 2.2 (who's
installer
had real changes in several respects) to be a green light.
These are up, but unlike most releases I won't move aside the 2.2.4/2.0.59
binaries; added a caveat that modperl was reported to have issues with
this
along with other 3rdparty modules who rely on win32-specific behaviors.
Bill
---------------------------------------------------------------------
The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project.
See <URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
" from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project.
See <URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
" from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
